Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15504846›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2004

Comparative pharmacokinetics of intramuscular artesunate and artemether in patients with severe falciparum malaria.

T T Hien, T M E Davis, L V Chuong, K F Ilett, D X T Sinh, N H Phu, C Agus, G M Chiswell, N J White, J Farrar

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artemether for severe malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Artemether for severe malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Artesunate versus quinine for treating severe malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Artemisinin-resistant malaria.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Advances and roadblocks in the treatment of malaria.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  17. Artemisinin Binds and Inhibits the Activity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Comparative effects of artemether and in combination with diminazene aceturate in the treatment of experimentalJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

T T HienOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, 190 Ben Ham Tu, Quan 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. jeremyjf@hcm.vnn.vn.
T M E Davis
L V Chuong
K F Ilett
D X T Sinh
N H Phu
C Agus
G M Chiswell
N J White
J Farrar
Hospital for Tropical Diseases · VNUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Western Australia · AUFremantle Hospital · AUHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first-dose pharmacokinetic properties of intramuscular (i.m.) artesunate (ARTS; 2.4 mg/kg immediately [stat], followed by 1.2 mg/kg i.m. daily) and artemether (ARM; 3.2 mg/kg i.m. stat, followed by 1.6 mg/kg i.m. daily) were compared in Vietnamese adults with severe falciparum malaria. A total of 19 patients were studied; 9 received ARTS, and 10 received ARM. ARTS was absorbed very rapidly; concentrations in plasma peaked between 1,362 and 8,388 nmol/liter (median, 5,710 nmol/liter) within 20 min of injection and then declined with a median (range) half-life (t(1/2)) of 30 (3 to 67) min. ARTS was hydrolyzed rapidly and completely to the biologically active metabolite dihydroartemisinin (DHA). Peak DHA concentrations in plasma ranged between 1,718 and 7,080 nmol/liter (median, 3,060 nmol/liter) and declined with a t(1/2) of 52 (26 to 69) min. In contrast, ARM was slowly and erratically absorbed. The absorption profile appeared biphasic. Maximum ARM concentrations in plasma ranged between 67 nmol/liter (a value close to the 50% inhibitory concentration for some Plasmodium falciparum isolates) and 1,631 nmol/liter (median, 574 nmol/liter) and occurred at a median (range) of 10 (1.5 to 24) h. There was relatively little conversion to DHA. After i.m. injection in cases of severe malaria, absorption of the water-soluble ARTS is rapid and extensive, whereas the oil-based ARM is slowly and erratically absorbed, with relatively little conversion to the more active DHA. On the basis of this pharmacological study, parenteral ARTS is preferable to ARM as an initial antimalarial therapy, particularly in the most seriously ill patients. These findings should be formally assessed by a randomized clinical trial.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemisininsArtesunateChromatography, High Pressure LiquidGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHalf-LifeHumansInjections, IntramuscularMalaria, FalciparumMiddle AgedSesquiterpenesVietnamAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemisininsArtesunateSesquiterpenes

Identifiers

PMID15504846
PMCPMC525450
OpenAlexW2122167407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.