Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15504339›Full record

ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2004

Silencing of SARS-CoV spike gene by small interfering RNA in HEK 293T cells.

Zhao-ling Qin, Ping Zhao, Xiao-lian Zhang, Jian-guo Yu, Ming-mei Cao, Lan-juan Zhao, Jie Luan, Zhong-tian Qi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. COVID-19: fighting the invisible enemy with microRNAs.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Emerging Technologies for the Treatment of COVID-19.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Application of Nanotechnology in the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Prospects for RNAi Therapy of COVID-19.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhao-ling QinDepartment of Microbiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Ping Zhao
Xiao-lian Zhang
Jian-guo Yu
Ming-mei Cao
Lan-juan Zhao
Jie Luan
Zhong-tian Qi
Second Military Medical University · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two candidate small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) corresponding to severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike gene were designed and in vitro transcribed to explore the possibility of silencing SARS-CoV S gene. The plasmid pEGFP-optS, which contains the codon-optimized SARS-CoV S gene and expresses spike-EGFP fusion protein (S-EGFP) as silencing target and expressing reporter, was transfected with siRNAs into HEK 293T cells. At various time points of posttransfection, the levels of S-EGFP expression and amounts of spike mRNA transcript were detected by fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, Western blot, and real-time quantitative PCR, respectively. The results showed that the cells transfected with pEGFP-optS expressed S-EGFP fusion protein at a higher level compared with those transfected with pEGFP-S, which contains wildtype SARS-CoV spike gene sequence. The green fluorescence, mean fluorescence intensity, and SARS-CoV S RNA transcripts were found significantly reduced, and the expression of SARS-CoV S glycoprotein was strongly inhibited in those cells co-transfected with either EGFP- or S-specific siRNAs. Our findings demonstrated that the S-specific siRNAs used in this study were able to specifically and effectively inhibit SARS-CoV S glycoprotein expression in cultured cells through blocking the accumulation of S mRNA, which may provide an approach for studies on the functions of SARS-CoV S gene and development of novel prophylactic or therapeutic agents for SARS-CoV.

Indexed as

RNA InterferenceCell LineHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsRNA, Small InterferingSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusViral Envelope ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsRNA, Small InterferingSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15504339
PMCPMC7092946
OpenAlexW1998230676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.