Trial reportHNO2005
[Postoperative pain therapy after tonsillectomy in children. An observational study for 7 days].
Trial report in HNO, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe investigated the efficacy and side-effects of a concept for pain therapy after tonsillectomy in children. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 100 children aged between 6 and 14 years were treated according to the following protocol for pain therapy after tonsillectomy: after induction of anaesthesia the children received 35-40 mg/kg acetaminophen rectally and 0.1 mg/kg piritramide i.v.. Additionally, boluses of 0.05 mg/kg pitritramide i.v. were allowed in the recovery room and 2 doses of 20 mg/kg acetaminophen were given rectally every 6 h on the day of surgery. On the following day the children received 30 mg/kg acetaminophen 3 times per day and from the second postoperative day onwards 1 mg/kg diclofenac was given 3 times a day. The rescue therapy was 5 mg/kg metamizol orally. The severity of the postoperative pain was evaluated by a visual pain scale (VAS) (0-100), side-effects such as vomiting and postoperative haemorrhage were documented. The Friedman test was used for testing the time course of pain intensity.
resultsThe median of the VAS was 42 on the day of surgery, 35 on the first postoperative day and fell continuously to 10 by the 6th postoperative day. The decrease of pain severity was statistically significant (p <0.05). A rescue therapy was necessary in 6 patients on the day of surgery and in 9 patients on the first postoperative day. 7 patients suffered a postoperative haemorrhage, 4 out of the 7 needed a surgical revision and 2 out of 100 patients vomited.
conclusionWe conclude that this protocol for pain therapy after tonsillectomy was effective. The incidence of postoperative haemorrhage and vomiting was low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.