Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15499901›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2004

The Wheezing Illnesses Study Leidsche Rijn (WHISTLER): rationale and design.

N Katier, C S P M Uiterwaal, B M de Jong, J L L Kimpen, T J Verheij, D E Grobbee, B Brunekreef, M E Numans, C K van der Ent, Wheezing Illnesses Study Leidsche Rijn Study Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. E-health and consultation rates for respiratory illnesses in infants: a randomised clinical trial in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tracking Mental Wellbeing of Dutch Adolescents During the First Year of the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Longitudinal Study.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gender-Specific Changes in Life Satisfaction After the COVID-19-Related Lockdown in Dutch Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N KatierDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C S P M Uiterwaal
B M de Jong
J L L Kimpen
T J Verheij
D E Grobbee
B Brunekreef
M E Numans
C K van der Ent
Wheezing Illnesses Study Leidsche Rijn Study Group
University Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Wheezing Illnesses Study Leidsche Rijn (WHISTLER) was initiated in December 2001 as a single-centre prospective birth cohort study and will include a population-based sample of at least 2000 healthy newborns. The aims of WHISTLER are to investigate determinants for wheezing illnesses (including neonatal lung function, viral infections, asthma-susceptibility genes and endotoxin exposure) and to derive a comprehensive risk score, that is appropriate for use in primary health care and allows for efficient planning of early preventive strategies. Baseline examination includes a questionnaire evaluating known risk factors for wheezing illnesses; anthropometric measurements; measurements of infant and parental lung function; and sampling of infant and parental DNA. Participants will be followed for respiratory events using data from a daily respiratory symptom questionnaire; visits to the general practitioner (primary health care visits, drugs prescriptions and hospital referral); viral sampling during wheezing episodes; and house dust sampling. Based on actual neonatal care practice and embedded in a larger epidemiological study, the Utrecht Health Project, WHISTLER will provide an unique framework to address issues in childhood respiratory disease that are currently insufficiently understood. In particular, WHISTLER will provide a well-balanced view on the prognostic power of neonatal lung function and genetic and environmental factors (including viral infections and endotoxin exposure) to predict wheezing illnesses from birth to young adulthood and beyond. In the scope of prevention, WHISTLER is expected to support the design of solid based prevention measures to reduce respiratory morbidity, mortality and associated costs, and to improve quality of life.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentDustEndotoxinsEnvironmental ExposureHumansInfant, NewbornNetherlandsPolymerase Chain ReactionPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory SoundsRespiratory Tract DiseasesRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesVirus DiseasesDustEndotoxins

Identifiers

PMID15499901
PMCPMC7087709
OpenAlexW2093059600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.