Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15495080›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Substitution treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of HIV infection.

L Gowing, M Farrell, R Bornemann, R Ali

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00270257 (A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Drug Treatment in Prevention of HIV Infection and Death Among Opiate Dependent Injectors), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00270257 phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2008, after this paper: background citation

A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Drug Treatment in Prevention of HIV Infection and Death Among Opiate Dependent Injectors

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2008 to 2012Enrolled1,251ConditionsHIV Infections, Opioid-Related DisordersArmsBuprenorphine/Naloxone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. A treatment reengagement intervention for syringe exchangers.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2011
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Characteristics and response to treatment among Aboriginal people receiving heroin-assisted treatment.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The opioid crisis: past, present and future policy climate in Ontario, Canada.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L GowingEvidence-Based Practice Unit, Drug and Alcohol Services Council, 161 Greenhill Road, Parkside, SA, Australia, 5063. gowing.linda@saugov.sa.gov.au
M Farrell
R Bornemann
R Ali
Bielefeld University · DENational Drug Addiction Center · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInjecting drug users are vulnerable to infection with HIV and other blood borne viruses as a result of collective use of injecting equipment as well as sexual behaviour.

objectivesTo assess the effect of oral substitution treatment for opioid dependent injecting drug users on rates of HIV infections, and high risk behaviours. SEARCH STRATEGY: Multiple electronic databases were searched. Reference lists of retrieved studies, reviews and conference abstracts were handsearched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were required to consider the incidence of risk behaviours, or the incidence of HIV infection related to substitution treatment of opioid dependence. All types of original studies were considered. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Each potentially relevant study was independently assessed by two reviewers. For studies that met the inclusion criteria, key information was extracted by one reviewer and confirmed by consultation between all four reviewers. MAIN

resultsTwenty-eight studies, involving 7900 participants, were included. The majority were not randomised controlled studies. Issues of confounding and bias are discussed. The studies varied in several aspects limiting the extent of quantitative analysis. REVIEWERS'

conclusionsOral substitution treatment for opioid-dependent injecting drug users is associated with statistically significant reductions in illicit opioid use, injecting use and sharing of injecting equipment. It is also associated with reductions in the proportion of injecting drug users reporting multiple sex partners or exchanges of sex for drugs or money, but has little effect on condom use. It appears that the reductions in risk behaviours related to drug use do translate into reductions in cases of HIV infection. The lack of data from randomised controlled studies limits the strength of the evidence presented in this review. However, these findings add to the stronger evidence of effectiveness of substitution treatment on drug use, and treatment retention outcomes shown by other systematic reviews. On this basis, the provision of substitution treatment for opioid dependence in countries with emerging HIV and injecting drug use problems as well as in countries with established populations of injecting drug users should be supported.

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorAdministration, OralHIV InfectionsHumansNarcoticsOpioid-Related DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk-TakingSubstance Abuse, IntravenousNarcotics

Identifiers

PMID15495080
OpenAlexW2108596543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.