SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors for pulmonary hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of pulmonary hypertension of sickle cell disease.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2014Guideline
- Prostacyclin for pulmonary hypertension in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005Pooled it
- Efficacy of Sildenafil in Patients with Severe COVID-19 and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Viruses · 2023Trial
- Function of sildenafil on diseases other than urogenital system: An umbrella review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- No, we are not-we keep forgetting the right ventricle.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Article
- Review: Hemodynamic Characteristics and Outcomes of Sickle Cell Disease Associated Pulmonary Hypertension.Ethnicity & disease · 2016Review
- An integrative review of systematic reviews related to the management of breathlessness in respiratory illnesses.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2010Review
- Current practices in the use of sildenafil for pulmonary arterial hypertension in Brazilian hospitals.BMC research notes · 2009Article
- Tadalafil: the evidence for its clinical potential in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.Core evidence · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary Hypertension (PH) can be either of unknown aetiology (primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH)) or due to a known underlying cause (secondary pulmonary hypertension (SPH). Pulmonary arteriolar vasoconstriction is considered to be an important characteristic of PH. Therapies which aim to vasodilate are used to treat pulmonary hypertension.
objectivesTo determine the clinical efficacy of sildenafil, a vasodilator which works through inhibition of the enzyme phosphodiesterase type V (PDE5I), administered via any route to people with pulmonary hypertension in primary or secondary forms. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic databases were searched with pre-defined search terms. Searches were current as of November 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials were considered for inclusion in the review. We included studies which assessed the effects of sildenafil in participants with PPH and SPH. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed and extracted data from clinical trials. Data were entered in RevMan Analyses 1.0.2. Continuous data were pooled with an estimate on either WMD (weighted mean difference) or SMD (standardised mean difference) scales. Dichotomous data were pooled and a RR (relative risk) was calculated. MAIN
resultsFour studies recruiting 77 participants met the inclusion criteria of the review. Two studies assessed the acute effects of sildenafil. Two small crossover study assessed the effects of long term administration. The 'acute effect' studies indicated that sildenafil has a pulmonary vasodilatory effect. The two crossover studies showed improvement in symptoms. One study showed improvement in fatigue domains from a validated health status questionnaire. Both crossover studies reported that the drug was well tolerated. REVIEWERS'
conclusionsThe validity of the observed effects is undermined by small participant numbers and inadequate exploration of the different disease etiologies. The effects on long term outcome such as NYHA functional class, symptoms, mortality and exercise capacity require further validation. More studies of adequate size are required before the long term effects of sildenafil on clinically important outcomes can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.