Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15495035›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis.

H Dagfinrud, T K Kvien, K B Hagen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessment and treatment of psoriatic spondylitis.Current rheumatology reports · 2009
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Physical Therapy in the early treatment of ankylosing spondylitis].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2008
    Article
  12. Appropriate management of axial spondyloarthritis.Current rheumatology reports · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H DagfinrudSection for Health Science, University of Oslo, P.O. box 1153, Blindern, Gydas vei 8, Oslo, Norway, 0316. h.s.dagfinrud@medisin.uio.no
T K Kvien
K B Hagen
Diakonhjemmet Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnkylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic, inflammatory rheumatic disease. Due to the consequences of the disease, physiotherapy is considered to be an important part of the overall management of AS.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to summarise the available scientific evidence on the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions in the management of AS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL and PEDro up to February 2004 for all relevant publications, without any language restrictions. The reference lists of relevant articles were checked and the authors of included articles were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi-randomised studies with patients classified by the AS New York criteria and where at least one of the comparison groups received some kind of physiotherapy. The main outcomes of interest were pain, stiffness, spinal mobility, physical function and patient global assessment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed trial quality. Investigators were contacted to obtain missing information. MAIN

resultsSix trials with a total of 561 participants were included in this updated review as compared to three trials and 241 patients in the previous version. Two trials compared individualised home exercise programs with no intervention and reported low quality evidence for effects in spinal mobility (relative percentage differences (RPD) 37%) and physical function, in favour of the home exercise program. Three trials compared supervised group physiotherapy with an individualised home-exercise program and reported moderate quality evidence for small differences in spinal mobility (RPD 18%) and patient global assessment in favour of supervised group exercises. Finally, in one study a three week inpatient spa-exercise therapy followed by 37 weeks of weekly outpatient group physiotherapy (without spa) was compared with weekly outpatient group physiotherapy alone; there was moderate quality evidence for effects in pain (RPD 18%), physical function (RPD 24%) and patient global assessment (RPD 29%), in favour of the combined spa-exercise therapy. REVIEWERS'

conclusionsThe results of this review suggest that a home exercise program is better than no intervention, supervised group physiotherapy is better than home exercises, and that combined inpatient spa-exercise therapy followed by supervised outpatient weekly group physiotherapy is better than weekly group physiotherapy alone. The tendency toward positive effects of physiotherapy in the management of AS calls for further research in this field. New trials should also address other physiotherapy interventions commonly used in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesAmbulatory CareHospitalizationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf CareSpondylitis, Ankylosing

Identifiers

PMID15495035
OpenAlexW4238020434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.