Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15495026›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Buprenorphine for the management of opioid withdrawal.

L Gowing, R Ali, J White

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Alpha₂-adrenergic agonists for the management of opioid withdrawal.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. The effectiveness of compulsory drug treatment: A systematic review.The International journal on drug policy · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Detoxification treatments for opiate dependent adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Do placebo response rates from cessation trials inform on strength of addictions?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2012
    Pooled it
  7. Comparison of methadone and buprenorphine for opiate detoxification (LEEDS trial): a randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Inpatient versus other settings for detoxification for opioid dependence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Prevention of HIV infection among injection drug users in resource-limited settings.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2010
    Review
  14. Opioid dependence treatment: options in pharmacotherapy.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2009
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Is methadone too dangerous for opiate addiction?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L GowingEvidence-Based Practice Unit, Drug and Alcohol Services Council, 161 Greenhill Road, Parkside, SA, Australia, 5063. gowing.linda@saugov.sa.gov.au
R Ali
J White
University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManaged withdrawal (detoxification) is a necessary step prior to drug-free treatment. It may also represent the end point of long-term opioid replacement treatment such as methadone maintenance. The availability of managed withdrawal is essential to an effective treatment system.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of interventions involving the use of buprenorphine to manage opioid withdrawal, in terms of withdrawal signs and symptoms, completion of withdrawal and adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: Multiple electronic databases (including Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Australian Medical Index, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register) were systematically searched to October 2003. Reference lists of retrieved studies, reviews and conference abstracts were handsearched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled trials comparing buprenorphine with reducing doses of methadone, alpha2 adrenergic agonists, symptomatic medications or placebo, or comparing different buprenorphine-based regimes, to modify the signs and symptoms of withdrawal in participants who were primarily opioid dependent. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer assessed studies for inclusion and undertook data extraction. Inclusion decisions and the overall process were confirmed by consultation between all three reviewers. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality. Meta-analysis was undertaken where possible, with sensitivity analyses used to assess the impact of methodological quality. MAIN

resultsThirteen studies (10 RCTs), involving 744 participants, met the criteria for inclusion in the review. Seven studies compared buprenorphine with clonidine; 3 compared buprenorphine with methadone; 1 compared buprenorphine with oxazepam; 2 compared rapid and slow rates of tapering buprenorphine dose; 1 compared 3 different starting doses of buprenorphine. For groups treated with buprenorphine, withdrawal severity was less than that in groups treated with clonidine; peak severity was similar to those treated with methadone, but withdrawal symptoms may resolve more quickly with buprenorphine. Withdrawal is probably more severe when doses are tapered rapidly following a period of maintenance treatment. Buprenorphine is associated with fewer adverse effects than clonidine, and completion of withdrawal is significantly more likely with buprenorphine (Relative Risk 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.13, 1.62). In the two available studies, there was no statistically significant difference in rates of completion of withdrawal for buprenorphine compared to methadone in reducing doses. Completion of withdrawal following buprenorphine maintenance treatment may be more likely when doses are reduced gradually. REVIEWERS'

conclusionsBuprenorphine is more effective than clonidine for the management of opioid withdrawal. There appears to be no significant difference between buprenorphine and methadone in terms of completion of withdrawal, but withdrawal symptoms may resolve more quickly with buprenorphine. Many aspects of treatment protocol and relative effectiveness need to be investigated further in order to determine the most effective way of using buprenorphine to manage opioid withdrawal.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseBuprenorphineClonidineHumansNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeBuprenorphineClonidineNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID15495026
OpenAlexW4252840407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.