Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15492554›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2004

Tissue-engineered small intestine improves recovery after massive small bowel resection.

Tracy C Grikscheit, Aleem Siddique, Erin R Ochoa, Ashok Srinivasan, Eben Alsberg, Richard A Hodin, Joseph P Vacanti

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 219 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bioengineering of Intestinal Grafts.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Tissue Engineering for Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Tracts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. R-Spondin 1 (RSPO1) Increases Mouse Intestinal Organoid Unit Size and SurvivalFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  19. Building Scaffolds for Tubular Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tracy C GrikscheitDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Aleem Siddique
Erin R Ochoa
Ashok Srinivasan
Eben Alsberg
Richard A Hodin
Joseph P Vacanti
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRescue with tissue-engineered small intestine (TESI) after massive small bowel resection (MSBR). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Short bowel syndrome is a morbid product of massive small bowel resection. We report the first replacement of a vital organ by tissue engineering with TESI after MSBR.

methodsTen male Lewis rats underwent TESI implantation with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-marked cells (TESI+, n = 5) or sham laparotomy (TESI-, n = 5) followed by MSBR. Side-to-side anastomosis of TESI to proximal small intestine was performed or omitted. TESIO animals underwent implantation of engineered intestine with no further surgery. Weights were measured QOD until day 40. Transit times were measured. DNA assay was performed with computer morphometry. Northern blots of RNA were probed for intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP) and villin. Hematoxylin and eosin, S100, and smooth muscle actin immunohistochemistry were performed. Blood was collected at sacrifice.

resultsAll 10 rats initially lost then regained weight. The initial rate of weight loss was higher in TESI+ versus TESI-, but the nadir was reached a week earlier with more rapid weight gain subsequently to 98% preoperative weight on day 40 in animals with engineered intestine versus 76% (P < 0.03). Serum B12 was higher at 439 pg/mL versus 195.4 pg/mL. IAP mRNA appeared greater in TESI+ than TESIO, with constant villin levels. Histology revealed appropriate architecture including nerve. GFP labeling persisted.

conclusionsAnastomosis of TESI significantly improved postoperative weight and B12 absorption after MSBR. IAP, a marker of differentiation in intestinal epithelium, is present in TESI, and GFP labeling was accomplished.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringActinsAlkaline PhosphataseAnimalsBody WeightGastrinsGastrointestinal TransitImmunohistochemistryIntestine, SmallMaleMicrofilament ProteinsOrganoidsRatsRats, Inbred LewRNAS100 ProteinsActinsAlkaline PhosphataseGastrinsMicrofilament ProteinsRNAS100 ProteinsvillinVitamin B 12

Identifiers

PMID15492554
PMCPMC1356478
OpenAlexW2040622136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.