Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15492037›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Processes and problems in the formative evaluation of an interface to the Foundational Model of Anatomy knowledge base.

Linda G Shapiro, Emily Chung, Landon T Detwiler, José L V Mejino, Augusto V Agoncillo, James F Brinkley, Cornelius Rosse

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An ontology-based comparative anatomy information system.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2011
    Article
  3. Of mice and men: design of a comparative anatomy information system.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Linda G ShapiroStructural Informatics Group, Department of Medical Education and Biomedical Informatics, Box 352350, Computer Science and Engineering, 634 Paul Allen Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. shapiro@cs.washington.edu
Emily Chung
Landon T Detwiler
José L V Mejino
Augusto V Agoncillo
James F Brinkley
Cornelius Rosse

Funding

STRUCTURAL INFORMATION FRAMEWORK FOR BRAIN MAPPINGR01DC002310 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRINKLEY, JAMES F · 1994 to 2006
$2.5M
Interdisciplinary Center for Structural InformaticsP20LM007714 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRINKLEY, JAMES F · 2003 to 2005
$1.9M
FOUNDATION MODEL OF ANATOMYR01LM006822 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ROSSE, CORNELIUS M · 1999 to 2002
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC02310NLM NIH HHS LM007714NLM NIH HHS LM06822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Digital Anatomist Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) is a large semantic network of more than 100,000 terms that refer to the anatomical entities, which together with 1.6 million structural relationships symbolically represent the physical organization of the human body. Evaluation of such a large knowledge base by domain experts is challenging because of the sheer size of the resource and the need to evaluate not just classes but also relationships. To meet this challenge, the authors have developed a relation-centric query interface, called Emily, that is able to query the entire range of classes and relationships in the FMA, yet is simple to use by a domain expert. Formative evaluation of this interface considered the ability of Emily to formulate queries based on standard anatomy examination questions, as well as the processing speed of the query engine. Results show that Emily is able to express 90% of the examination questions submitted to it and that processing time is generally 1 second or less, but can be much longer for complex queries. These results suggest that Emily will be a very useful tool, not only for evaluating the FMA, but also for querying and evaluating other large semantic networks.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceUser-Computer InterfaceVocabulary, ControlledAnatomyHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalModels, Anatomic

Identifiers

PMID15492037
PMCPMC543825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.