Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1549117›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1992

Evidence that USF can interact with only a single general transcription complex at one time.

G Adami, L E Babiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G AdamiLaboratory of Molecular Cell Biology, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021.
L E Babiss
Research Triangle Park Foundation · USRockefeller University · US

Funding

TRANSFORMATION PROGRESSION AND AD5 GENE REGULATIONR29CA048707 · NCI · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI BABISS, LEE · 1989 to 1991
–
NCI NIH HHS CA48707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By in vitro analysis, the major late promoter (MLP) of adenovirus has been shown to be a simple promoter requiring two elements for efficient transcription: a minimal promoter element (MPE), where the general transcription factor-polymerase II complex binds, and a single functional upstream promoter element (UPE) which interacts with USF. Two hundred bases upstream of the MLP cap site and divergently oriented is the IVa2 promoter. This promoter has its own MPE but shares the MLP UPE, suggesting the possibility that these promoters are coordinately regulated. To determine mechanistically how this might function, we replaced the weak IVa2 minimal promoter with a strong MPE (from the viral E1A gene) and observed mutual inhibition of both promoters and unstable transcription factor binding. Only by duplication of the UPE could this inhibition be relieved. When tested independently, both promoters were shown to require the USF site for maximal activity. These results are compatible with a model in which USF can stably interact with only one transcription complex at a time. When two divergently oriented general transcription complexes compete efficiently for binding of USF, transcription is reduced to the same levels as if the USF site were absent.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, ViralAdenoviridaeBase SequenceBinding, CompetitiveDNA, RecombinantMolecular Sequence DataPromoter Regions, GeneticTATA BoxTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticUpstream Stimulatory FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, RecombinantTranscription FactorsUpstream Stimulatory Factors

Identifiers

PMID1549117
PMCPMC369606
OpenAlexW2310948624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.