Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15489525›Full record

ArticleGenetics2005

Functional evolution of the vertebrate Myb gene family: B-Myb, but neither A-Myb nor c-Myb, complements Drosophila Myb in hemocytes.

Colin J Davidson, Rabindra Tirouvanziam, Leonard A Herzenberg, Joseph S Lipsick

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unveiling the hemolymphatic miRNome composition of the schistosomiasis vector snailCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  2. Erythropoiesis: insights from a genomic perspective.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MYB Transcription Factors Becoming Mainstream in Plant Roots.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Structural mechanism of Myb-MuvB assembly.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Genome-Wide Characterization and Expression Analyses ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  16. TheBiology open · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Evolution of the 3R-MYB Gene Family in Plants.Genome biology and evolution · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colin J DavidsonDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Rabindra Tirouvanziam
Leonard A Herzenberg
Joseph S Lipsick
Stanford University · US

Funding

MULTI COLORS FACS--ADVANCEMENT FOR EXTENDED APPLICATIONSR01EB000231 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HERZENBERG, LEONARD A · 2002 to 2004
$1.4M
ONCOGENIC ACTIVATION OF MYB FAMILY PROTEINSR01CA056509 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIPSICK, JOSEPH STEVEN · 1994 to 2003
$1.3M
Function of the Drosophila Myb Proto-OncogeneR01CA090307 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIPSICK, JOSEPH STEVEN · 2002 to 2005
$917k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA056509NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090307NCI NIH HHS R01 CA56509NCI NIH HHS R01 CA90307NIBIB NIH HHS EB000231NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The duplication of genes and genomes is believed to be a major force in the evolution of eukaryotic organisms. However, different models have been presented about how duplicated genes are preserved from elimination by purifying selection. Preservation of one of the gene copies due to rare mutational events that result in a new gene function (neofunctionalization) necessitates that the other gene copy retain its ancestral function. Alternatively, preservation of both gene copies due to rapid divergence of coding and noncoding regions such that neither retains the complete function of the ancestral gene (subfunctionalization) may result in a requirement for both gene copies for organismal survival. The duplication and divergence of the tandemly arrayed homeotic clusters have been studied in considerable detail and have provided evidence in support of the subfunctionalization model. However, the vast majority of duplicated genes are not clustered tandemly, but instead are dispersed in syntenic regions on different chromosomes, most likely as a result of genome-wide duplications and rearrangements. The Myb oncogene family provides an interesting opportunity to study a dispersed multigene family because invertebrates possess a single Myb gene, whereas all vertebrate genomes examined thus far contain three different Myb genes (A-Myb, B-Myb, and c-Myb). A-Myb and c-Myb appear to have arisen by a second round of gene duplication, which was preceded by the acquisition of a transcriptional activation domain in the ancestral A-Myb/c-Myb gene generated from the initial duplication of an ancestral B-Myb-like gene. B-Myb appears to be essential in all dividing cells, whereas A-Myb and c-Myb display tissue-specific requirements during spermatogenesis and hematopoiesis, respectively. We now report that the absence of Drosophila Myb (Dm-Myb) causes a failure of larval hemocyte proliferation and lymph gland development, while Dm-Myb(-/-) hemocytes from mosaic larvae reveal a phagocytosis defect. In addition, we show that vertebrate B-Myb, but neither vertebrate A-Myb nor c-Myb, can complement these hemocyte proliferation defects in Drosophila. Indeed, vertebrate A-Myb and c-Myb cause lethality in the presence or absence of endogenous Dm-Myb. These results are consistent with a neomorphic origin of an ancestral A-Myb/c-Myb gene from a duplicated B-Myb-like gene. In addition, our results suggest that B-Myb and Dm-Myb share essential conserved functions that are required for cell proliferation. Finally, these experiments demonstrate the utility of genetic complementation in Drosophila to explore the functional evolution of duplicated genes in vertebrates.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene DuplicationAnimalsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCell ProliferationDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGenes, DominantGenes, mybGenetic Complementation TestHemocytesJanus Kinase 1LarvaLymph NodesAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsJanus Kinase 1Protein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Cell SurfaceSTAT1 Transcription FactorTl protein, DrosophilaToll-Like ReceptorsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID15489525
PMCPMC1448883
OpenAlexW2105857125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.