ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2004
Dynamic molecular resolution imaging of preocular fluid impressions.
Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distribution of sialic acids on mucins and gels: a defense mechanism.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Glycan structures of ocular surface mucins in man, rabbit and dog display species differences.Glycoconjugate journal · 2008Article
- Release of membrane-associated mucins from ocular surface epithelia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe preocular fluid is renewed with molecules secreted by the underlying cells and with lacrimal gland secretions, while maintaining a stable surface topography. The authors tested the hypothesis that interactions between gelled and newly inserted mucins are the key to this stability.
methodsUsing atomic force microscopy, the authors studied the topography of the freshly isolated preocular fluid obtained by impression cytology. The effects of adding mucins to this impression were compared with adding mucins to a pure mucin macromolecular assembly as a single component control to the more complex preocular fluid. The control structure was built up by repeated addition of pure ocular mucin to a tethering surface.
resultsImaging at molecular resolution showed a thin layer of superficial preocular fluid with an appearance consistent with a gel that was very flat, with surface roughness of approximately 0.1 nm. Mucin molecules adhering to a clean flat surface maintained their individual character when overlapping, whereas molecules integrating in the impression could not be followed individually. Both the preocular impression and the pure mucin assembly were stable under imaging for at least 90 minutes. The roughness of the pure mucin network decreased as more mucin was added. In contrast, there was a small increase in the roughness of the 2.25 microm2 area of impression over the 60 minutes of continuous imaging, although locally there appeared to be infill of low height features. Disulphide bond breaking resulted in the collapse of the imaged structure in both the pure mucin control and the more complex ex vivo preocular impression.
conclusionsPolymeric mucins linked by disulphide bonds prevent or lessen loss of ocular surface material into the surrounding aqueous tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.