Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15489355›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2004

Antibody therapy in the management of shiga toxin-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Saul Tzipori, Abhineet Sheoran, Donna Akiyoshi, Arthur Donohue-Rolfe, Howard Trachtman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. EnterohemorrhagicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Therapeutic Antibodies Against Shiga Toxins: Trends and Perspectives.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Treatment Strategies for Infections With Shiga Toxin-ProducingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Baicalin inhibits the lethality of Shiga-like toxin 2 in mice.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saul TziporiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, 200 Westborough Rd., North Grafton, MA 01536, USA. Saul.tzipori@tufts.edu.
Abhineet Sheoran
Donna Akiyoshi
Arthur Donohue-Rolfe
Howard Trachtman
Tufts University · US

Funding

Specific Human Monoclonal Antibodies for HUS ProphylaxisR01AI041326 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI TZIPORI, SAUL R · 1996 to 2007
$1.9M
RECOMBINANT SHIGA-TOXIN-SPECIFIC HUMAN ANTIBODIESR01DK058993 · NIDDK · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI TZIPORI, SAUL R · 2000 to 2004
$1.7M
MULTICENTER TRIAL OF SYNSORB PK IN E COLI RELATED HUSR01DK052147 · NIDDK · LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER · PI TRACHTMAN, HOWARD · 1996 to 2003
$704k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI041326NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI41326NIDDK NIH HHS DK52147NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK058993NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK52115NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK58993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a disease that can lead to acute renal failure and often to other serious sequelae, including death. The majority of cases are attributed to infections with Escherichia coli, serotype O157:H7 strains in particular, which cause bloody diarrhea and liberate one or two toxins known as Shiga toxins 1 and 2. These toxins are thought to directly be responsible for the manifestations of HUS. Currently, supportive nonspecific treatment is the only available option for the management of individuals presenting with HUS. The benefit of antimicrobial therapy remains uncertain because of several reports which claim that such intervention can in fact exacerbate the syndrome. There have been only a few specific therapies directed against neutralizing the activities of these toxins, but none so far has been shown to be effective. This article reviews the literature on the mechanism of action of these toxins and the clinical manifestations and current management and treatment of HUS. The major focus of the article, however, is the development and rationale for using neutralizing human antibodies to combat this toxin-induced disease. Several groups are currently pursuing this approach with either humanized, chimeric, or human antitoxin antibodies produced in transgenic mice. They are at different phases of development, ranging from preclinical evaluation to human clinical trials. The information available from preclinical studies indicates that neutralizing specific antibodies directed against the A subunit of the toxin can be highly protective. Such antibodies, even when administered well after exposure to bacterial infection and onset of diarrhea, can prevent the occurrence of systemic complications.

Indexed as

Immunization, PassiveAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibody SpecificityDisease Models, AnimalHemolytic-Uremic SyndromeHumansShiga Toxin 2Shigella dysenteriaeAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalShiga Toxin 2

Identifiers

PMID15489355
PMCPMC523565
OpenAlexW2105634414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.