Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15489334›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

The status, quality, and expansion of the NIH full-length cDNA project: the Mammalian Gene Collection (MGC).

Daniela S Gerhard, Lukas Wagner, Elise A Feingold, Carolyn M Shenmen, Lynette H Grouse, Greg Schuler, Steven L Klein, Susan Old, Rebekah Rasooly, Peter Good and 106 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 282 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
282citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

282 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 588 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association of OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and pancreatic cancer susceptibility: evidence from a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Perplexity as a Metric for Isoform Diversity in the Human Transcriptome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Understanding PACS2 syndrome's pathomechanism by studying E209K and E211K mutations.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Review

222 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Morrin, Ryan [corrected to Morin, Ryan]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

116 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniela S Gerhard
Lukas Wagner
Elise A Feingold
Carolyn M Shenmen
Lynette H Grouse
Greg Schuler
Steven L Klein
Susan Old
Rebekah Rasooly
Peter Good
Mark Guyer
Allison M Peck
Jeffery G Derge
David Lipman
Francis S Collins
Wonhee Jang
Steven Sherry
Mike Feolo
Leonie Misquitta
Eduardo Lee
Kirill Rotmistrovsky
Susan F Greenhut
Carl F Schaefer
Kenneth Buetow
Tom I Bonner
David Haussler
Jim Kent
Mark Kiekhaus
Terry Furey
Michael Brent
Christa Prange
Kirsten Schreiber
Nicole Shapiro
Narayan K Bhat
Ralph F Hopkins
Florence Hsie
Tom Driscoll
M Bento Soares
Tom L Casavant
Todd E Scheetz
Michael J Brown-stein
Ted B Usdin
Shiraki Toshiyuki
Piero Carninci
Yulan Piao
Dawood B Dudekula
Minoru S H Ko
Koichi Kawakami
Yutaka Suzuki
Sumio Sugano
C E Gruber
M R Smith
Blake Simmons
Troy Moore
Richard Waterman
Stephen L Johnson
Yijun Ruan
Chia Lin Wei
S Mathavan
Preethi H Gunaratne
Jiaqian Wu
Angela M Garcia
Stephen W Hulyk
Edwin Fuh
Ye Yuan
Anna Sneed
Carla Kowis
Anne Hodgson
Donna M Muzny
John McPherson
Richard A Gibbs
Jessica Fahey
Erin Helton
Mark Ketteman
Anuradha Madan
Stephanie Rodrigues
Amy Sanchez
Michelle Whiting
Anup Madari
Alice C Young
Keith D Wetherby
Steven J Granite
Peggy N Kwong
Charles P Brinkley
Russell L Pearson
Gerard G Bouffard
Robert W Blakesly
Eric D Green
Mark C Dickson
Alex C Rodriguez
Jane Grimwood
Jeremy Schmutz
Richard M Myers
Yaron S N Butterfield
Malachi Griffith
Obi L Griffith
Martin I Krzywinski
Nancy Liao
Ryan Morin
Ryan Morrin
Diana Palmquist
Anca S Petrescu
Ursula Skalska
Duane E Smailus
Jeff M Stott
Angelique Schnerch
Jacqueline E Schein
Steven J M Jones
Robert A Holt
Agnes Baross
Marco A Marra
Sandra Clifton
Kathryn A Makowski
Stephanie Bosak
Joel Malek
MGC Project Team
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of British Columbia · CABaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Iowa · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USWashington University in St. Louis · USAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USScience Applications International Corporation (United States) · USThe University of Tokyo · JPNational Institute of Genetics · JP

Funding

Multi-Species Comparative Sequencing of Targeted GenomicZ01HG000196 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GREEN, ERIC · 2001 to 2008
$19.1M
SECRETIN/VIP FAMILY RECEPTORSZ01MH002685 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI USDIN, TED B · 1994 to 2008
$3.1M
Systematic analysis of gene regulatory networksZ01AG000656 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI KO, MINORU S · 1999 to 2008
$1.6M
WHOLE DATABASE AND WHOLE GENOME COMPARISON TOOLZ01LM000077 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LIPMAN, DAVID J. · 1997 to 2008
$139k
Cloning of G protein coupled receptors for the MammalianZ01MH002836 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BONNER, TOM I · 2004 to 2005
–
PHS HHS N01-C0-12400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health's Mammalian Gene Collection (MGC) project was designed to generate and sequence a publicly accessible cDNA resource containing a complete open reading frame (ORF) for every human and mouse gene. The project initially used a random strategy to select clones from a large number of cDNA libraries from diverse tissues. Candidate clones were chosen based on 5'-EST sequences, and then fully sequenced to high accuracy and analyzed by algorithms developed for this project. Currently, more than 11,000 human and 10,000 mouse genes are represented in MGC by at least one clone with a full ORF. The random selection approach is now reaching a saturation point, and a transition to protocols targeted at the missing transcripts is now required to complete the mouse and human collections. Comparison of the sequence of the MGC clones to reference genome sequences reveals that most cDNA clones are of very high sequence quality, although it is likely that some cDNAs may carry missense variants as a consequence of experimental artifact, such as PCR, cloning, or reverse transcriptase errors. Recently, a rat cDNA component was added to the project, and ongoing frog (Xenopus) and zebrafish (Danio) cDNA projects were expanded to take advantage of the high-throughput MGC pipeline.

Indexed as

DNA, ComplementaryGene LibraryAnimalsCloning, MolecularComputational BiologyDNA PrimersHumansMiceNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Open Reading FramesRatsUnited StatesXenopus laevisZebrafishDNA, ComplementaryDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID15489334
PMCPMC528928
OpenAlexW189143987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.