Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15482555›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2004

Development and validation of a functional morbidity index to predict mortality in community-dwelling elders.

Elise C Carey, Louise C Walter, Karla Lindquist, Kenneth E Covinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Senior adult oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2012
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. A clinical score to predict 6-month prognosis in elderly patients starting dialysis for end-stage renal disease.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2009
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Changes in the Hierarchy of Functional Impairment From Middle Age to Older Age.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022
    Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elise C CareyDivision of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. ecarson@medicine.ucsf.edu
Louise C Walter
Karla Lindquist
Kenneth E Covinsky

Funding

Prognosis/Risk Indices for Function/Mortality in EldersR01AG019827 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI COVINSKY, KENNETH E. · 2001 to 2003
$747k
COMPREHENSIVE OUTCOMES OF FRAIL ELDERS IN THE COMMUNITYK02HS000006 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI COVINSKY, KENNETH E. · 2000 to 2004
–
AHRQ HHS K02 HS000006AHRQ HHS K02HS00006-01NIA NIH HHS R01 AG019827NIA NIH HHS R01AG19827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFunctional measures have a great appeal for prognostic instruments because they are associated with mortality, they represent the end-impact of disease on the patient, and information about them can be obtained directly from the patient. However, there are no prognostic indices that have been developed for community-dwelling elders based primarily on functional measures. Our objective in this study was to develop and validate a prognostic index for 2-year mortality in community-dwelling elders, based on self-reported functional status, age, and gender.

designPopulation-based cohort study from 1993 to 1995.

settingCommunity-dwelling elders within the United States.

participantsSubjects, age > or =70 (N = 7,393), from the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old study. We developed the index in 4,516 participants (mean age 78, 84% white, 61% female), and validated it in 2,877 different participants (mean age 78, 73% white, 61% female).

main outcome measuresPrediction of 2-year mortality using risk factors such as activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, additional measures of physical function, age, and gender.

resultsOverall mortality was 10% in the development cohort and 12% in the validation cohort. In the development cohort, 6 independent predictors of mortality were identified and weighted, using logistic regression models, to create a point scale: male gender, 2 points; age (76 to 80, 1 point; >80, 2 points); dependence in bathing, 1 point; dependence in shopping, 2 points; difficulty walking several blocks, 2 points; and difficulty pulling or pushing heavy objects, 1 point. We calculated risk scores for each patient by adding the points of each independent risk factor present. In the development cohort, 2-year mortality was 3% in the lowest risk group (0 to 2 points), 11% in the middle risk group (3 to 6 points), and 34% in the highest risk group (>7 points). In the validation cohort, 2-year mortality was 5% in the lowest risk group, 12% in the middle risk group, and 36% in the highest risk group. The c-statistics for the point system were 0.76 and 0.74 in the development and validation cohorts, respectively.

conclusionsThis prognostic index, which relies solely on self-reported functional status, age, and gender, provides a simple and accurate method of stratifying community-dwelling elders into groups at varying risk of mortality.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingGeriatric AssessmentHealth Status IndicatorsMortalityAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMalePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsResidence CharacteristicsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID15482555
PMCPMC1492580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.