Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15477593›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2004

A rapid bioassay for single bacterial cell quantitation using bioconjugated nanoparticles.

Xiaojun Zhao, Lisa R Hilliard, Shelly John Mechery, Yanping Wang, Rahul P Bagwe, Shouguang Jin, Weihong Tan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
28.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 567 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Real-TimeACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Nanomedicine: New Frontiers in Fighting Microbial Infections.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Nano-engineered tools in the diagnosis, therapeutics, prevention, and mitigation of SARS-CoV-2.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  16. Nanotools for Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021
    Review
  17. Silica Nanoparticles.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaojun ZhaoCenter for Research at the Bio/Nano Interface, Department of Chemistry, and The Shands Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Lisa R Hilliard
Shelly John Mechery
Yanping Wang
Rahul P Bagwe
Shouguang Jin
Weihong Tan
University of Florida Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid and sensitive determination of pathogenic bacteria is extremely important in biotechnology, medical diagnosis, and the current fight against bioterrorism. Current methods either lack ultrasensitivity or take a long time for analysis. Here, we report a bioconjugated nanoparticle-based bioassay for in situ pathogen quantification down to single bacterium within 20 min. The bioconjugated nanoparticle provides an extremely high fluorescent signal for bioanalysis and can be easily incorporated with biorecognition molecules, such as antibody. The antibody-conjugated nanoparticles can readily and specifically identify a variety of bacterium, such as Escherichia coli O157:H7, through antibody-antigen interaction and recognition. The single-bacterium-detection capability within 20 min has been confirmed by the plate-counting method and realized by using two independent optical techniques. The two detection methods correlated extremely well. Furthermore, we were able to detect multiple bacterial samples with high throughput by using a 384-well microplate format. To show the usefulness of this assay, we have accurately detected 1-400 E. coli O157 bacterial cells in spiked ground beef samples. Our results demonstrate the potential for a broad application of bioconjugated nanoparticles in practical biotechnological and medical applications in various biodetection systems. The ultimate power of integrating bionanotechnology into complex biological systems will emerge as a revolutionary tool for ultrasensitive detection of disease markers and infectious agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacillus cereusBiological AssayCattleColony Count, MicrobialEscherichia coli O157Fluorescent DyesFluoroimmunoassayFood MicrobiologyMeatMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNanotubesSalmonella typhimuriumSpectrometry, FluorescenceSpores, BacterialAntibodies, BacterialFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID15477593
PMCPMC524056
OpenAlexW2115068023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.