Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15477389›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2004

Conservation of adjacency as evidence of paralogous operons.

Sarath Chandra Janga, Gabriel Moreno-Hagelsieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The gene regulatory network ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Operon prediction in Pyrococcus furiosus.Nucleic acids research · 2007
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarath Chandra JangaProgram of Computational Genomics, CIFN-UNAM, Apdo Postal 565-A, Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62100 Mexico.
Gabriel Moreno-Hagelsieb

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the analyses on the conservation of gene order are limited to orthologous genes. However, the organization of genes into operons might also result in the conservation of gene order of paralogous genes. Thus, we sought computational evidence that conservation of gene order of paralogous genes represents another level of conservation of genes in operons. We found that pairs of genes within experimentally characterized operons of Escherichia coli K12 and Bacillus subtilis tend to have more adjacently conserved paralogs than pairs of genes at transcription unit boundaries. The fraction of same strand gene pairs corresponding to conserved paralogs averages 0.07 with a maximum of 0.22 in Borrelia burgdorferi. The use of evidence from the conservation of adjacency of paralogous genes can improve the prediction of operons in E.coli K12 by approximately 0.27 over predictions using conservation of adjacency of orthologous genes alone.

Indexed as

OperonBacillus subtilisComputational BiologyEscherichia coliGene Order

Identifiers

PMID15477389
PMCPMC524292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.