Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15472349›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Cryptococcus gattii.

Luciana Trilles, Belkys Fernández-Torres, Márcia dos Santos Lazéra, Bodo Wanke, Josep Guarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pulmonary Cryptococcosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. In Silico Structural Modeling and Analysis of Interactions ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Infection and drug resistance · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cryptococcus gattii infections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luciana TrillesServiçio de Micología Médica, Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Belkys Fernández-Torres
Márcia dos Santos Lazéra
Bodo Wanke
Josep Guarro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have determined the in vitro susceptibilities of 57 strains of Cryptococcus gattii to nine antifungal agents and have compared the MICs for these strains with those for C. neoformans. MICs were determined by a microdilution reference method. Albaconazole and ravuconazole (MICs of 0.04 and 0.05 microg/ml, respectively) showed the best activities. Micafungin showed no activity (MIC of >128 microg/ml). In general, C. gattii was less susceptible than C. neoformans to all drugs tested, with the exception of amphotericin B and flucytosine.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCryptococcusCryptococcus neoformansHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsQuinazolinesThiazolesTriazolesalbaconazoleAntifungal AgentsER 30346QuinazolinesThiazolesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID15472349
PMCPMC522305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.