Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15472301›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis, a novel typing scheme to study the genetic relatedness and epidemiology of Enterococcus faecium isolates.

Janetta Top, Leo M Schouls, Marc J M Bonten, Rob J L Willems

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genotypic Analysis of the Population Structure inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The changing epidemiology of VanB Enterococcus faecium in Poland.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Diversity of plasmids and Tn1546-type transposons among VanA Enterococcus faecium in Poland.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  9. Invasive enterococcal infections in Poland: the current epidemiological situation.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2016
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Environmental survival of vancomycin-sensitive ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (AREfm).European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janetta TopEijkman-Winkler Institute for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Inflammation, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.top@digd.azu.nl
Leo M Schouls
Marc J M Bonten
Rob J L Willems

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiresistant Enterococcus faecium is a major cause of hospital acquired infections and outbreaks. Here, we describe the development of multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) as a novel typing method to assess the genetic relatedness of E. faecium isolates. Six VNTR loci were used to genotype 392 isolates recovered from different animals and human community, hospital survey, and clinical isolates. From 3 to 13 alleles were found per locus, resulting in 127 different MLVA profiles. Clustering of MLVA profiles confirmed the host-specific genogroups found by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and showed the grouping of clinical and epidemic isolates that belonged to the MLST-C1 cluster in a distinct MLVA-C1 cluster (sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 90%). Furthermore, the discriminatory power of MLVA is comparable to MLST. MLVA profiles appeared to be relatively stable, since isolates from a single outbreak shared the same MLVA profile, which is a prerequisite when MLVA is used to study hospital outbreaks. Our data show that MLVA is a highly reproducible and portable typing method; in contrast to MLST, it is fast, relatively cheap, and easy to perform. Furthermore, it has the abilities of MLST to recognize genetically related and potential epidemic isolates. Submission of MLVA profiles is possible via a Web-based database for international comparison.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesDisease OutbreaksEnterococcus faeciumGenotypeGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHospitalsHumansMinisatellite RepeatsPolymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID15472301
PMCPMC522339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.