Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15466589›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2004

Isolation of lightning-competent soil bacteria.

Hélène Cérémonie, François Buret, Pascal Simonet, Timothy M Vogel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microfluidic Electroporation: Recent Advances and Applications.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Antimicrobial resistance in the food chain: a review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Natural Pseudomonas sp. strain N3 in artificial soil microcosms.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2006
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hélène CérémonieEcologie Microbienne UMR-CNRS 5557, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, BAt. G. Mendel, 43 Blvd. du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
François Buret
Pascal Simonet
Timothy M Vogel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial transformation is typically performed in the laboratory by using either a chemical (CaCl(2)) or an electrical (electroporation) method. However, laboratory-scale lightning has been shown recently to electrotransform Escherichia coli strain DH10B in soil. In this paper, we report on the isolation of two "lightning-competent" soil bacteria after direct electroporation of the Nycodenz bacterial ring extracted from prairie soil in the presence of the pBHCRec plasmid (Tc(r), Sp(r), Sm(r)). The electrotransformability of the isolated bacteria was measured both in vitro (by electroporation cuvette) and in situ (by lightning in soil microcosm) and then compared to those of E. coli DH10B and Pseudomonas fluorescens C7R12. The electrotransformation frequencies measured reached 10(-3) to 10(-4) by electroporation and 10(-4) to 10(-5) by simulated lightning, while no transformation was observed in the absence of electrical current. Two of the isolated lightning-competent soil bacteria were identified as Pseudomonas sp. strains.

Indexed as

LightningSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaElectroporationGenes, BacterialMolecular Sequence DataPlasmidsPseudomonasTransformation, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID15466589
PMCPMC522088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.