Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15466428›Full record

ArticleGenetics2005

Communication between parental and developing genomes during tetrahymena nuclear differentiation is likely mediated by homologous RNAs.

Douglas L Chalker, Patrick Fuller, Meng-Chao Yao

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetics of ciliates.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Douglas L ChalkerDepartment of Biology, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, USA. dchalker@biology2.wustl.edu
Patrick Fuller
Meng-Chao Yao
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USInstitute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica · TWWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

GENE AMPLIFICATION AND ELIMINATION IN TETRAHYMENAR01GM026210 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YAO, MENG-CHAO H · 1985 to 2006
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-26210NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 6000 DNA elements, totaling nearly 15 Mb, are coordinately excised from the developing somatic genome of Tetrahymena thermophila. An RNA interference (RNAi)-related mechanism has been implicated in the targeting of these germline-limited sequences for chromatin modification and subsequent DNA rearrangement. The excision of individual DNA segments can be inhibited if the homologous sequence is placed within the parental somatic nucleus, indicating that communication occurs between the parental and developing genomes. To determine how the DNA content of one nucleus is communicated to the other, we assessed DNA rearrangement occurring in wild-type cells that were mated to cells that contained the normally germline-limited M element within their somatic nuclei. M-element rearrangement was blocked in the wild-type cell even when no genetic exchange occurred between mating partners, a finding that is inconsistent with any genetic imprinting models. This inhibition by the parental somatic nucleus was rapidly established between 5 and 6 hr of conjugation, near or shortly after the time that zygotic nuclei are formed. M-element small RNAs (sRNAs) that are believed to direct its rearrangement were found to rapidly accumulate during the first few hours of conjugation before stabilizing to a low, steady-state level. The period between 5 and 6 hr during which sRNA levels stabilize correlates with the time after which the parental genome can block DNA rearrangement. These data lead us to suggest that homologous sRNAs serve as mediators to communicate sequence-specific information between the parental and developing genomes, thereby regulating genome-wide DNA rearrangement, and that these sRNAs can be effectively compared to the somatic genome of both parents.

Indexed as

Gene RearrangementGenome, ProtozoanAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell NucleusChromatinConjugation, GeneticGenes, ProtozoanGenomic ImprintingRNA InterferenceRNA, ProtozoanRNA, Small NuclearTetrahymena thermophilaZygoteChromatinRNA, ProtozoanRNA, Small Nuclear

Identifiers

PMID15466428
PMCPMC1448867
OpenAlexW1996832056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.