Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15466288›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

Genetic and haplotype diversity among wild-derived mouse inbred strains.

Folami Y Ideraabdullah, Elena de la Casa-Esperón, Timothy A Bell, David A Detwiler, Terry Magnuson, Carmen Sapienza, Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The CommensalImmunoHorizons · 2018
    Article
  11. Wild-derived mice: from genetic diversity to variation in immune responses.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Whole exome sequencing of wild-derived inbred strains of mice improves power to link phenotype and genotype.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Folami Y IderaabdullahDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Elena de la Casa-Esperón
Timothy A Bell
David A Detwiler
Terry Magnuson
Carmen Sapienza
Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena

Funding

Genetic and Molecular Analysis of DDK SyndromeR01HD034508 · NICHD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI SAPIENZA, CARMEN · 1997 to 2009
$2.9M
Maternal Meiotic Drive of Mouse Chromosome 11R01GM062537 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · PI SAPIENZA, CARMEN · 2001 to 2004
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD034508NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD34508NIGMS NIH HHS GM62537NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the completion of the mouse genome sequence, it is possible to define the amount, type, and organization of the genetic variation in this species. Recent reports have provided an overview of the structure of genetic variation among classical laboratory mice. On the other hand, little is known about the structure of genetic variation among wild-derived strains with the exception of the presence of higher levels of diversity. We have estimated the sequence diversity due to substitutions and insertions/deletions among 20 inbred strains of Mus musculus, chosen to enable interpretation of the molecular variation within a clear evolutionary framework. Here, we show that the level of sequence diversity present among these strains is one to two orders of magnitude higher than the level of sequence diversity observed in the human population, and only a minor fraction of the sequence differences observed is found among classical laboratory strains. Our analyses also demonstrate that deletions are significantly more frequent than insertions. We estimate that 50% of the total variation identified in M. musculus may be recovered in intrasubspecific crosses. Alleles at variants positions can be classified into 164 strain distribution patterns, a number exceeding those reported and predicted in panels of classical inbred strains. The number of strains, the analysis of multiple loci scattered across the genome, and the mosaic nature of the genome in hybrid and classical strains contribute to the observed diversity of strain distribution patterns. However, phylogenetic analyses demonstrate that ancient polymorphisms that segregate across species and subspecies play a major role in the generation of strain distribution patterns.

Indexed as

HaplotypesAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMutagenesis, InsertionalPhylogenySequence Deletion

Identifiers

PMID15466288
PMCPMC524411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.