Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15464208›Full record

ReviewBrain research. Brain research reviews2004

Opioid research in amphibians: an alternative pain model yielding insights on the evolution of opioid receptors.

Craig W Stevens

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research. Brain research reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Quantitative and Qualitative Behavioral Measurements to Assess Pain in Axolotls (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
  3. How evolutionary psychiatry can advance psychopharmacology
.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analgesia in amphibians: preclinical studies and clinical applications.The veterinary clinics of North America. Exotic animal practice · 2011
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Comparison of buprenorphine and butorphanol analgesia in the eastern red-spotted newt (Notophthalmus viridescens).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The evolution of vertebrate opioid receptors.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2009
    Review
  14. Evolution of vertebrate opioid receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Craig W StevensDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Center for Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 1111 West 17th Street, Tulsa, OK 74107-1898, USA. scraig@chs.okstate.edu
Oklahoma State University · US

Funding

FUNCTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OPIOID RECEPTORSR15DA012448 · NIDA · OSU CENTER OF HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEVENS, CRAIG W · 1999 to 2007
$497k
NIDA NIH HHS R15 DA012448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review summarizes the work from our laboratory investigating mechanisms of opioid analgesia using the Northern grass frog, Rana pipiens. Over the last dozen years, we have accumulated data on the characterization of behavioral effects after opioid administration on radioligand binding by using opioid agonist and antagonist ligands in amphibian brain and spinal cord homogenates, and by cloning and sequencing opioid-like receptor cDNA from amphibian central nervous system (CNS) tissues. The relative analgesic potency of mu, delta, and kappa opioids is highly correlated between frogs and other mammals, including humans. Radioligand binding studies using selective opioid agonists show a similar selectivity profile in amphibians and mammals. In contrast, opioid antagonists that are highly selective for mammalian mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors were not selective in behavioral and binding studies in amphibians. Three opioid-like receptor cDNAs were cloned and sequenced from amphibian brain tissues and are orthologs to mammalian mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors. Bioinformatics analysis of the three types of opioid receptor cDNAs from all vertebrate species with full datasets gave a pattern of the molecular evolution of opioid receptors marked by the divergence of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptor sequences during vertebrate evolution. This divergence in receptor amino acid sequence in later-evolved vertebrates underlies the hypothesis that opioid receptors are more type-selective in mammals than in nonmammalian vertebrates. The apparent order of receptor type evolution is kappa, then delta, and, most recently, the mu opioid receptor. Finally, novel bioinformatics analyses suggest that conserved extracellular receptor domains determine the type selectivity of vertebrate opioid receptors.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, AnimalAmphibiansAnimalsCentral Nervous SystemNarcoticsPainProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, OpioidSequence Homology, Amino AcidNarcoticsReceptors, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID15464208
PMCPMC3069712
OpenAlexW1970052320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.