Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15462682›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2004

Patients' perspectives on high-tech home care: a qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies.

Pascale Lehoux

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Telerehabilitation for peripheral facial palsy: A scoping review.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Body-Worn Sensors in Parkinson's Disease: Evaluating Their Acceptability to Patients.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Recruitment and training for home hemodialysis: experience and lessons from the Nocturnal Dialysis Trial.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Patient-perceived barriers to the adoption of nocturnal home hemodialysis.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pascale LehouxDepartment of Health Administration, Interdisciplinary Health Research Group (GRIS), University of Montreal, P,O, Box 6128, Branch Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7 Canada. pascale.lehoux@umontreal.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe delivery of technology-enhanced home care is growing in most industrialized countries. The objective of our study was to document, from the patient's perspective, how the level of user-friendliness of medical technology influences its integration into the private and social lives of patients. Understanding what makes a technology user-friendly should help improve the design of home care services.

methodsFour home care interventions that are frequently used and vary in their technical and clinical features were selected: Antibiotic intravenous therapy, parenteral nutrition, peritoneal dialysis and oxygen therapy. Our qualitative study relied on the triangulation of three sources of data: 1) interviews with patients (n = 16); 2) interviews with carers (n = 6); and 3) direct observation of nursing visits of a different set of patients (n = 16). Participants of varying socioeconomic status were recruited through primary care organizations and hospitals that deliver home care within 100 km of Montreal, the largest urban area in the province of Quebec, Canada.

resultsThe four interventions have both a negative and positive effect on patients' lives. These technologies were rarely perceived as user-friendly, and user-acceptance was closely linked to user-competence. Compared with acute I.V. patients, who tended to be passive, chronic patients seemed keener to master technical aspects. While some of the technical and human barriers were managed well in the home setting, engaging in the social world was more problematic. Most patients found it difficult to maintain a regular job because of the high frequency of treatment, while some carers found their autonomy and social lives restricted. Patients also tended to withdraw from social activities because of social stigmatization and technical barriers.

conclusionsWhile technology contributes to improving the patients' health, it also imposes significant constraints on their lives. Policies aimed at developing home care must clearly integrate principles and resources supporting the appropriate use of technology. Close monitoring of patients should be part of all technology-enhanced home care programs.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesSickness Impact ProfileAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelCaregiversCommunity Health NursingFemaleHemodialysis, HomeHome Infusion TherapyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMan-Machine SystemsMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID15462682
PMCPMC526262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.