ReviewCurrent urology reports2004
Urodynamics in the era of tension-free slings: defining the role.
Review in Current urology reports, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is there still a place for the pubovaginal sling at the bladder neck in the era of the midurethral sling?Current urology reports · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of urodynamics in the routine preoperative evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence is controversial. The introduction of tension-free mid-urethral sling procedures has created a new paradigm in surgical management. The capability of performing these procedures on an ambulatory basis has created more uncertainty about the use of urodynamic testing. The long-term results of these procedures in patients with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency, mixed incontinence, and voiding dysfunction are not clearly known. This article reviews the mechanism of action and results of tension-free slings and proposes a rational role for urodynamic testing in patients considered for these procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.