Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15461802›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2004

A genome annotation-driven approach to cloning the human ORFeome.

John E Collins, Charmain L Wright, Carol A Edwards, Matthew P Davis, James A Grinham, Charlotte G Cole, Melanie E Goward, Begoña Aguado, Meera Mallya, Younes Mokrab and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Distinct roles of nuclear basket proteins in directing the passage of mRNA through the nuclear pore.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. BCL2L13: physiological and pathological meanings.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

John E CollinsThe Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
Charmain L Wright
Carol A Edwards
Matthew P Davis
James A Grinham
Charlotte G Cole
Melanie E Goward
Begoña Aguado
Meera Mallya
Younes Mokrab
Elizabeth J Huckle
David M Beare
Ian Dunham

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a systematic approach to generating cDNA clones containing full-length open reading frames (ORFs), exploiting knowledge of gene structure from genomic sequence. Each ORF was amplified by PCR from a pool of primary cDNAs, cloned and confirmed by sequencing. We obtained clones representing 70% of genes on human chromosome 22, whereas searching available cDNA clone collections found at best 48% from a single collection and 60% for all collections combined.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanChromosomes, Human, Pair 22Cloning, MolecularComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDNA, ComplementaryGenomicsHumansOpen Reading FramesPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProteomeResearch DesignSequence Analysis, DNADNA, ComplementaryProteome

Identifiers

PMID15461802
PMCPMC545604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.