Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15459806›Full record

SynthesisDer Unfallchirurg2004

[Shock trauma room management of spinal injuries in the framework of multiple trauma. A systematic review of the literature].

A Woltmann, V Bühren

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Der Unfallchirurg, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Timing of intervention for spinal injury in patients with polytrauma.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. ATLS(R) and damage control in spine trauma.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Polytrauma--pathophysiology and management principles.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2008
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A WoltmannBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Murnau. Woltmann@bgu-murnau.de
V Bühren
Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injuries to the spine are often part of life-threatening multiple trauma. In this review diagnostics and emergency room management were investigated in order to formulate effective recommendations for the emergency strategy. Clinical trials were systematically collected (MEDLINE, Cochrane, and hand searches) and classified into evidence levels (1 to 5 according to the Oxford system). The patient's history and clinical symptoms have low rates for specificity and positive predictive value, whereas their negative predictive value and sensitivity are high between 90 and 100%, respectively. CT imaging reaches higher rates for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in comparison to conventional radiographic series. The patient's history should be asked and clinical investigation should be done in any case. Imaging diagnostics preferably as multislice spiral CT should be performed after stabilization of the patient's general condition and before admission to the intensive care unit.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicComorbidityCritical CareEmergency Medical ServicesEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMultiple TraumaPractice Patterns, Physicians'Risk AssessmentRisk FactorsSpinal Cord InjuriesTrauma Centers

Identifiers

PMID15459806
OpenAlexW121122835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.