Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15459665›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2004

In search of the holy replicator.

David M Gilbert

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic methods for measuring DNA replication dynamics.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Review
  7. Origins of DNA replication.PLoS genetics · 2019
    Review
  8. Mechanisms and regulation of DNA replication initiation in eukaryotes.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Chromatin and DNA replication.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  14. Analysis of a Drosophila amplicon in follicle cells highlights the diversity of metazoan replication origins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David M GilbertDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NewYork 13210, USA. gilbertd@upstate.edu

Funding

Specification of Mammalian Replication OriginsR01GM057233 · NIGMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI GILBERT, DAVID M · 1998 to 2005
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After 40 years of searching for the eukaryotic replicator sequence, it is time to abandon the concept of 'the' replicator as a single genetic entity. Here I propose a 'relaxed replicon model' in which a positive initiator-replicator interaction is facilitated by a combination of several complex features of chromatin. An important question for the future is whether the positions of replication origins are simply a passive result of local chromatin structure or are actively localized to coordinate replication with other chromosomal activities.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationModels, GeneticRepliconAnimalsBase SequenceDNADNA, ViralEukaryotic CellsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansDNADNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID15459665
PMCPMC1255919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.