Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15459241›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2004

Developmental programming of the metabolic syndrome by maternal nutritional imbalance: how strong is the evidence from experimental models in mammals?

James A Armitage, Imran Y Khan, Paul D Taylor, Peter W Nathanielsz, Lucilla Poston

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02728635 (Epigenetic Regulation of Human Adipose Tissue Distribution), which is not on this map. Cited by 180 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
35.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02728635 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Epigenetic Regulation of Human Adipose Tissue Distribution

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealth Translational Research InstituteRan2016 to 2026Enrolled27ConditionsObesityArmsDual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)/ Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), Adipose tissue biopsies, FSIGTT/ RMR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 527 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

James A ArmitageMaternal and Fetal Research Unit, Department of Women's Health, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London, UK. james.armitage@kcl.ac.uk
Imran Y Khan
Paul D Taylor
Peter W Nathanielsz
Lucilla Poston
King's College London · GBThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

PARTURITION AND FETAL PRIMATE HYPOTHALAMIC FUNCTIONP01HD021350 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI NIJLAND, MARK J · 1987 to 2018
$19.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD021350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of the metabolic syndrome, a cluster of abnormalities focusing on insulin resistance and associated with high risk for cardiovascular disease and diabetes, is reaching epidemic proportions. Prevalent in both developed and developing countries, the metabolic syndrome has largely been attributed to altered dietary and lifestyle factors that favour the development of central obesity. However, population-based studies have suggested that predisposition to the metabolic syndrome may be acquired very early in development through inappropriate fetal or neonatal nutrition. Further evidence for developmental programming of the metabolic syndrome has now been suggested by animal studies in which the fetal environment has been manipulated through altered maternal dietary intake or modification of uterine artery blood flow. This review examines these studies and assesses whether the metabolic syndrome can be reliably induced by the interventions made. The validity of the different species, diets, feeding regimes and end-point measures used is also discussed.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnimalsFemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMetabolic SyndromePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID15459241
PMCPMC1665360
OpenAlexW1602240110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.