Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15459054›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

ICRAM (the International Campaign to Revitalise Academic Medicine): agenda setting.

International Working Party to Promote and Revitalise Academic Medicine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Career choice in academic medicine: systematic review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2006
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How to attract, retain and nurture young academic clinicians.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2011
    Article
  11. The WHO UNESCO FIP Pharmacy Education Taskforce.Human resources for health · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How far is the future?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Academic medicine: the evidence base.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004
    Article
  18. Who cares about academic medicine?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

International Working Party to Promote and Revitalise Academic Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Academies and InstitutesBiomedical ResearchInternational CooperationInterprofessional RelationsSocial ValuesTeaching

Identifiers

PMID15459054
PMCPMC521005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.