Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15456963›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2004

Resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, streptogramin, ketolide, and oxazolidinone antibiotics.

Marilyn C Roberts

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing with Raman Biosensing.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Antibiotic Resistance and Mechanisms of Pathogenic Bacteria in Tubo-Ovarian Abscess.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparison of antimicrobial resistance genes in feedlots and urban wastewater.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marilyn C RobertsDepartment of Pathobiology, Box 357238, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. marilynr@u.washington.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrolides have enjoyed a resurgence as new derivatives and related compounds have come to market. These newer compounds have become important in the treatment of community-acquired pneumoniae and nontuberculosis-Mycobacterium diseases. In this review, the bacterial mechanisms of resistance to the macrolide, lincosamide, streptogramin, ketolide, and oxazolidinone antibiotics, the distribution of the various acquired genes that confer resistance, as well as mutations that have been identified in clinical and laboratory strains are examined.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsConjugation, GeneticDrug Resistance, BacterialGenes, BacterialGene Transfer, HorizontalKetolidesLincosamidesMacrolidesMutationOxazolidinonesStreptograminsAnti-Bacterial AgentsKetolidesLincosamidesMacrolidesOxazolidinonesStreptogramins

Identifiers

PMID15456963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.