Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15454562›Full record

ArticleGenetics2004

Simultaneous estimation of haplotype frequencies and quantitative trait parameters: applications to the test of association between phenotype and diplotype configuration.

Kyoko Shibata, Toshikazu Ito, Yutaka Kitamura, Naoko Iwasaki, Hiroshi Tanaka, Naoyuki Kamatani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kyoko ShibataDepartment of Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 113-8510, Japan.
Toshikazu Ito
Yutaka Kitamura
Naoko Iwasaki
Hiroshi Tanaka
Naoyuki Kamatani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of the haplotype-phenotype relationship has become more and more important. We have developed an algorithm, using individual genotypes at linked loci as well as their quantitative phenotypes, to estimate the parameters of the distribution of the phenotypes for subjects with and without a particular haplotype by an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. We assumed that the phenotype for a diplotype configuration follows a normal distribution. The algorithm simultaneously calculates the maximum likelihood (L0max) under the null hypothesis (i.e., nonassociation between the haplotype and phenotype), and the maximum likelihood (Lmax) under the alternative hypothesis (i.e., association between the haplotype and phenotype). Then we tested the association between the haplotype and the phenotype using a test statistic, -2 log(L0max/Lmax). The above algorithm along with some extensions for different modes of inheritance was implemented as a computer program, QTLHAPLO. Simulation studies using single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes have clarified that the estimation was very accurate when the linkage disequilibrium between linked loci was rather high. Empirical power using the simulated data was high enough. We applied QTLHAPLO for the analysis of the real data of the genotypes at the calpain 10 gene obtained from diabetic and control subjects in various laboratories.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticPhenotypeQuantitative Trait, HeritableBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexCalpainComputer SimulationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HaplotypesHumansInsulinLikelihood FunctionsLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBlood GlucoseCalpaincalpain 10Insulin

Identifiers

PMID15454562
PMCPMC1448120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.