Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15454542›Full record

ArticleGenetics2004

Identification of a locus under complex positive selection in Drosophila simulans by haplotype mapping and composite-likelihood estimation.

Colin D Meiklejohn, Yuseob Kim, Daniel L Hartl, John Parsch

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A selective sweep across species boundaries in Drosophila.Molecular biology and evolution · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tracking footprints of maize domestication and evidence for a massive selective sweep on chromosome 10.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Measuring natural selection on genotypes and phenotypes in the wild.Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2009
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Colin D MeiklejohnDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. cmeiklejohn@oeb.harvard.edu
Yuseob Kim
Daniel L Hartl
John Parsch

Funding

GENETICS OF A NEWLY EVOLVED TESTES SPECIFIC GENE SDICR01GM060035 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HARTL, DANIEL L. · 1999 to 2003
$955k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM60035NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent action of positive selection is expected to influence patterns of intraspecific DNA sequence variation in chromosomal regions linked to the selected locus. These effects include decreased polymorphism, increased linkage disequilibrium, and an increased frequency of derived variants. These effects are all expected to dissipate with distance from the selected locus due to recombination. Therefore, in regions of high recombination, it should be possible to localize a target of selection to a relatively small interval. Previously described patterns of intraspecific variation in three tandemly arranged, testes-expressed genes (janusA, janusB, and ocnus) in Drosophila simulans included all three of these features. Here we expand the original sample and also survey nucleotide polymorphism at three neighboring loci. On the basis of recombination events between derived and ancestral alleles, we localize the target of selection to a 1.5-kb region surrounding janusB. A composite-likelihood-ratio test based on the spatial distribution and frequency of derived polymorphic variants corroborates this result and provides an estimate of the strength of selection. However, the data are difficult to reconcile with the simplest model of positive selection, whereas a new composite-likelihood method suggests that the data are better described by a model in which the selected allele has not yet gone to fixation.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationModels, GeneticPolymorphism, GeneticSelection, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceComputer SimulationDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHaplotypesLikelihood FunctionsMolecular Sequence DataSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNADrosophila ProteinsjanA protein, DrosophilaJanB protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID15454542
PMCPMC1448127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.