ArticleDer Radiologe2004
[CTA of carotid artery with different scanner types].
Article in Der Radiologe, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?Clinical neuroradiology · 2015Article
- [Cerebrovascular diagnostics: imaging].Der Radiologe · 2012Article
- [Value of CT and MR angiography for diagnostics of intracranial aneurysms].Der Radiologe · 2011Review
- [CT diagnostics of carotid artery stenosis].Der Radiologe · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noninvasive modalities like CTA are increasingly replacing selective angiography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Dedicated scan protocols and contrast injection techniques are mandatory for the morphological assessment of carotid artery stenosis. These protocols need to be adapted to different scanner types. The delineation of plaque components and the residual lumen is improved with high resolution scan protocols and dedicated reconstruction algorithms. The exact delineation of in-stent stenosis remains limited. Standardization of postprocessing is crucial in order to attain reproducible results. Multislice spiral CT allows reliable grading of carotid artery stenosis. Relevant venous opacification and pulsation artifacts have to be expected with 4-slice scanners, the short scan time of the latest CT scanners minimize these problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.