Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15452693›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2004

Preferred plasma volume expanders for critically ill patients: results of an international survey.

Frédérique Schortgen, Nicolas Deye, Laurent Brochard, CRYCO Study Group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. [Crystalloids and colloids: fluid homeostasis and toxicity].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Review
  8. Human albumin solutions in intensive care: A review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frédérique SchortgenMedical and Infectious Diseases Intensive Care Unit, Bichat-Claude Bernard Teaching Hospital, 75018 Paris, France. frederique.schortgen@bch.ap-hop-paris.fr
Nicolas Deye
Laurent Brochard
CRYCO Study Group
Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor · FRHôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCriteria for plasma volume expander selection in critically ill patients remain controversial. This study evaluated preferences of intensivists regarding plasma volume expanders.

designInternational survey using a 75-item questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingAll members of the European and French Societies of Intensive Care Medicine (n=2,415 in 1,610 adult ICUs in Europe and elsewhere) were invited to participate, and 577 (24%) working in 515 ICUs (32%) returned completed questionnaires.

resultsAmong respondents, 17% used crystalloids alone as their first-choice strategy, 18% colloids alone, and 65% both. Colloids alone were often chosen in patients with cirrhosis (42%), coagulation disorders (42%), or adult respiratory distress syndrome (39%); and crystalloids in patients with dehydration (85%), drug overdose (59%), or acute renal failure (49%). First-line plasma expanders were as follows: isotonic crystalloids (81%), starches (55%), gelatins (35%), albumin (7%), plasma (6%), dextrans (4%), and hypertonic crystalloids (2%). Colloids alone were used more frequently in the United Kingdom (40%), starches in Germany (81%) and The Netherlands (66%), and gelatins in the United Kingdom (68%). The main factors behind preferences for first-line plasma volume expanders were time to volume loss correction, duration of effect, adverse events, and cost.

conclusionsColloids are widely used as first-line treatment, usually in combination with crystalloids. Starches are the most widely used colloids in Europe, where albumin use is declining. However, strategies vary widely across clinical situations and countries.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCritical CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'ColloidsCrystalloid SolutionsEuropeHumansIntensive Care UnitsIsotonic SolutionsMulticenter Studies as TopicPlasma SubstitutesSurveys and QuestionnairesColloidsCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsPlasma Substitutes

Identifiers

PMID15452693
OpenAlexW2065739021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.