ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2004
Comparison of the antinociceptive activity of two new NO-releasing derivatives of the NSAID S-ketoprofen in rats.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Chemistry to Pharmacology: Exploring the Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Potential of Novel Dexketoprofen Amide Derivatives.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Carboranyl Analogues of Ketoprofen with Cytostatic Activity against Human Melanoma and Colon Cancer Cell Lines.ACS omega · 2019Article
- Quantification of edematous changes by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in gastrocnemius muscles after spinal nerve ligation.PloS one · 2018Article
- Synergistic depression of NMDA receptor-mediated transmission by ketamine, ketoprofen and L-NAME combinations in neonatal rat spinal cords in vitro.British journal of pharmacology · 2008Article
- Nitroparacetamol (NCX-701) and pain: first in a series of novel analgesics.CNS drug reviews · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes inducing analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic actions. They are not devoid of severe side effects and so, the search for new compounds with similar or higher effectiveness and a lower incidence of undesired actions is important. Nitric oxide (NO)-releasing NSAIDs resulted from this search. 2 We have compared the antinociceptive effectiveness of cumulative doses of two new NO-releasing derivatives of S-ketoprofen, HCT-2037 and HCT-2040, using the recording of spinal cord nociceptive reflexes in anesthetized and awake rats and after intravenous and oral administration. 3 S-ketoprofen and HCT-2040 were equieffective in reducing responses to noxious mechanical stimulation after i.v. administration in anesthetized animals (ID50s: 1.3+/-0.1 and 1.6+/-0.2 micromol kg(-1) respectively), but did not modify wind-up. HCT-2037 was two-fold more potent (ID50 of 0.75+/-0.1 micromol kg(-1)) in responses to mechanical stimuli and very effective in reducing wind-up (63+/-17% of control; P<0.01; MED: 0.4 micromol kg(-1)), indicating a greater activity than the parent compound. 4 In awake animals with inflammation, HCT-2037 p.o. fully inhibited mechanical allodynia, 91+/-12% reduction, and hyperalgesia, 94+/-8% reduction. Equivalent doses of S-ketoprofen only partially reduced either allodynia (50+/-11%) or hyperalgesia (40+/-4%). The effect on responses to noxious thermal stimulation was similar for the two compounds. 5 We conclude that the molecular changes made in the structure of S-ketoprofen including an NO moiety in its structure, improve the antinociceptive profile of the compound opening new perspectives in a safer use of NSAIDs as analgesic drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.