Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15451771›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2004

Proteinase-activated receptor-4: evaluation of tethered ligand-derived peptides as probes for receptor function and as inflammatory agonists in vivo.

Morley D Hollenberg, Mahmoud Saifeddine, Sabrina Sandhu, Steeve Houle, Nathalie Vergnolle

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Antiplatelet Therapy.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Using PAR4 Inhibition as an Anti-Thrombotic Approach: Why, How, and When?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Novel Allosteric Modulators of G Protein-coupled Receptors.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Morley D HollenbergMucosal Inflammation Research Groups, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Proteases and Inflammation Network (PAIN), Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4N1. mhollenb@ucalgary.ca
Mahmoud Saifeddine
Sabrina Sandhu
Steeve Houle
Nathalie Vergnolle
University of Calgary · CACanadian Institutes of Health Research · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. We evaluated the ability of a number of peptides based on the tethered ligand sequences of human, rat and murine proteinase-activated receptor-4 (PAR(4)), to serve as receptor-activating probes or antagonists for bioassays carried out in vitro and for in vivo models of inflammation. 2. In a rat PAR(4)-dependent platelet aggregation assay, the relative potencies of the active sequences (AYPGKF-NH(2)>GYPGKF-NH(2)>GYPGFK-NH(2)>GFPGKP-NH(2)) were consistent with an activation of PAR(4). 3. In the aggregation assay, the reverse or partial reverse-sequence peptides (VQGPYG-NH(2), YAPGKF-NH(2) and FKGPYA-NH(2)) were inactive, while trans-cinnamoyl (Tc)-YPGKF-NH(2), Tc-APGKF-NH(2) and N-palmitoyl-SGRRYGHALR-NH(2) (pepducin P4pal-10) were antagonists. 4. However, in an endothelium-dependent NO-mediated rat aorta (RA) relaxation assay and in a gastric longitudinal muscle (LM) contraction assay, these antagonist peptides were agonists as were most other peptides, with distinct orders of potencies that differed for both the RA and LM assays and from the platelet assay. 5. We conclude that PAR(4)-derived tethered ligand peptide agonists can act at receptors other than PAR(4) and that a judicious choice of ligands is required to probe for PAR(4) function in bioassay systems and in particular for in vivo models. 6. By selecting from these peptides the ones most reliably reflecting PAR(4) activation (AYPGKF-NH(2) as a standard agonist; YAPGKF-NH(2) as a PAR(4)-inactive standard), we were able to establish an inflammatory role for the PAR(4)-activating peptides acting via a non-neurogenic mechanism in a rat paw oedema model.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugInflammationIn Vitro TechniquesLigandsMaleMuscle ContractionPeptide FragmentsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRats, WistarReceptors, ThrombinVasodilationLigandsPeptide Fragmentsprotease-activated receptor 4Receptors, Thrombin

Identifiers

PMID15451771
PMCPMC1575414
OpenAlexW1991882979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.