Trial reportDer Nervenarzt2005
[Who comes from where and who goes where? Treatment methods for psychiatric inpatients].
Trial report in Der Nervenarzt, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Who benefits from the night clinic? - Value of a part-time treatment facility].Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2017Article
- [Psychosocial integration of inpatients with borderline personality disorder: reflection of a health care system focused on symptom remission].Der Nervenarzt · 2013Article
- [Epidemiology of mental health care].Der Nervenarzt · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on data of the psychiatric basic documentation of 4066 patients, predictors of type of referral as well as outpatient aftercare were analyzed by means of logistic regression analyses. Of the patients, 25.7% were admitted without any referral, 18.4% were referred by a general practitioner, and 9.8% by a psychiatrist in private practice. Patients referred by a general practitioner suffered more frequently from an affective disorder or schizophrenia and were residents of senior citizen homes. Inpatients sent by a psychiatrist were more often residents of sheltered homes, showed a present episode lasting more than 3 months, and had undergone psychopharmacological pretreatment with an atypical antipsychotic or SSRI. Outpatient aftercare was recommended to 83.1% of inpatients: 49.4% by a general practitioner and 32.1% by a psychiatrist in private practice. Outpatient aftercare by a general practitioner was more frequent in the elderly and patients with addiction disorders. Referral by a psychiatrist in private practice as well as schizophrenia or an affective disorder led more often to outpatient aftercare by a psychiatrist. The small number of patients referred by general practitioners and psychiatrists in private practice has to become the focus of quality management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.