ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2004
[Stress incontinence and mixed incontinence].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the new ICS classifications urinary incontinence is divided by symptomatic, clinical and urodynamic criteria. Urinary incontinence is a non life-threatening condition, which may affect life quality a lot. Stress incontinence may present alone or may occur as mixed incontinence. The understanding of pathophysiological interactions is important to perform adequate diagnostics and start appropriate therapy. The patients should be informed about the wide spectrum of different conservative and surgical treatment options, their results and typical complications. Further randomised trials are necessary for critical evaluation of each treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15448903What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.