ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society1992
Dispersed repetitive elements in mouse genome analysis.
Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolation of monochromosomal hybrids for mouse chromosomes 3, 6, 10, 12, 14, and 18.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1997Article
- Mapping of murine YACs containing the genes Cea2 and Cea4 after B1-PCR amplification and FISH-analysis.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 1995Article
- Identification and characterization of a novel conserved DNA repeat.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1995Article
- Genetic and physical mapping of the biglycan gene on the mouse X chromosome.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1993Article
- Short, interspersed repetitive DNA sequences in prokaryotic genomes.Journal of bacteriology · 1992Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1543914What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.