Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1540729›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1992

Renal protective effect of enalapril in diabetic nephropathy.

S Björck, H Mulec, S A Johnsen, G Nordén, M Aurell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
20.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 438 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Active vitamin D treatment for reduction of residual proteinuria: a systematic review.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Impact of the preintervention rate of renal function decline on outcome of renoprotective intervention.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2008
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline on evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: A primer on what pharmacists need to know.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Tight Blood Pressure Control in Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S BjörckDepartment of Nephrology, Sahlgrenska Hospital, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
H Mulec
S A Johnsen
G Nordén
M Aurell
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme can reduce the rate of decline in kidney function more than reducing blood pressure with other antihypertensive treatment.

designProspective, open randomised study lasting a mean of 2.2 years in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

settingThree outpatient nephrology clinics. PATIENTS: 40 patients with insulin dependent diabetes and diabetic nephropathy with reduced renal function.

interventionAntihypertensive treatment with enalapril or metoprolol, usually combined with frusemide.

main outcome measureRate of decline in glomerular filtration rate measured as chromium-51 edetic acid clearance.

resultsGlomerular filtration rate declined a mean of 2.0 (SD 3.2) ml/min/year in the group given enalapril and 5.6 (5.9) ml/min/year in the control group. The mean arterial blood pressure during the study was 102 (5) mm Hg in the patients given enalapril and 103 (5) mm Hg in the patients given metoprolol. Urinary albumin excretion during treatment with enalapril was 60% lower than during treatment with metoprolol.

conclusionsEnalapril has an antiproteinuric effect independent of the effect on systemic blood pressure. Treatment with enalapril can reduce the rate of decline in kidney function in patients with diabetic nephropathy more than equally effective antihypertensive treatment with metoprolol. This points to a specific renal protective effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in diabetic nephropathy.

Indexed as

AdultBlood PressureDiabetic NephropathiesEnalaprilGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidneyMetoprololMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProteinuriaEnalaprilMetoprolol

Identifiers

PMID1540729
PMCPMC1881212
OpenAlexW2073935745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.