Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1540685›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1992

Lateral diffusion and aggregation. A Monte Carlo study.

M J Saxton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Finite element analysis of drug electrostatic diffusion: inhibition rate studies in N1 neuraminidase.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2009
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Density and diffusion limited aggregation in membranes.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 1995
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M J SaxtonInstitute of Theoretical Dynamics, University of California, Davis 95616.

Funding

LATERAL DIFFUSION IN AN ARCHIPELAGO: MONTE CARLO STUDIESR01GM038133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI SAXTON, MICHAEL J. · 1988 to 2011
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-38133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aggregation in a lipid bilayer is modeled as cluster-cluster aggregation on a square lattice. In the model, clusters carry out a random walk on the lattice, with a diffusion coefficient inversely proportional to mass. On contact, they adhere with a prescribed probability, rigidly and irreversibly. Monte Carlo calculations show that, as expected, rotational diffusion of the aggregating species is highly sensitive to the initial stages of aggregation. Lateral diffusion of an inert tracer obstructed by the aggregate is a sensitive probe of the later stages of aggregation. Cluster-cluster aggregates are much more effective barriers to lateral diffusion of an inert tracer than the same area fraction of random point obstacles is, but random point obstacles are more effective barriers than the same area fraction of compact obstacles. The effectiveness of aggregates as obstacles is discussed in terms of particle-particle correlation functions and fractal dimensions. Results are applicable to aggregation of membrane proteins, and at least qualitatively to aggregation of gel-phase lipid during lateral phase separation.

Indexed as

Monte Carlo MethodDiffusionGelsMathematicsMembrane ProteinsModels, TheoreticalProtein BindingProtein ConformationGelsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID1540685
PMCPMC1260228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.