ArticleThe Biochemical journal1992
Expression of glutathione S-transferase during rat liver development.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hepatocellular adenoma with severe fatty change in a male Spontaneously Diabetic Torii rat.Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2017Article
- Establishment of metabolism and transport pathways in the rodent and human fetal liver.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013Review
- Genetic and epigenetic regulation and expression signatures of glutathione S-transferases in developing mouse liver.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2010Article
- Age-dependent kinetics and metabolism of dichloroacetate: possible relevance to toxicity.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2008Article
- Differential expression of the rat gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase gene promoters along with differentiation of hepatoblasts into biliary or hepatocytic lineage.The American journal of pathology · 2000Article
- Growth hormone- and testosterone-dependent regulation of glutathione transferase subunit A5 in rat liver.The Biochemical journal · 1998Article
- Quantitative profiling of tissue- and gender-related expression of glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes in the mouse.The Biochemical journal · 1997Article
- Cellular sources of glutathione S-transferase P in primary cultured rat hepatocytes: localization by in situ hybridization.The Biochemical journal · 1994Article
- Differential expression of alpha, mu, and pi classes of glutathione S-transferases in chemosensory mucosae of rats during development.Cell and tissue research · 1994Article
- Sex-dependent expression and growth hormone regulation of class alpha and class mu glutathione S-transferase mRNAs in adult rat liver.The Biochemical journal · 1993Article
- The effect of hepatic regeneration on the expression of the glutathione S-transferases.The Biochemical journal · 1993Article
- Constitutive and inducible profile of glutathione S-transferase subunits in biliary epithelial cells and hepatocytes isolated from rat liver.The Biochemical journal · 1993Article
- Article
- Chlorambucil-monoglutathionyl conjugate is sequestered by human alpha class glutathione S-transferases.British journal of cancer · 1992Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ontogeny of rat liver glutathione S-transferase (EC 2.5.1.18) (GSTs) during foetal and postnatal development was investigated. The GSTs are dimers, the subunits of which belong to three multigene families, Alpha (subunits 1, 2, 8 and 10), Mu (subunits 3, 4, 6, 9 and 11) and Pi (subunit 7) [Mannervik, Alin, Guthenberg, Jennsson, Tahir, Warholm & Jörnvall (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 7202-7206; Kispert, Meyer, Lalor, Coles & Ketterer (1989) Biochem. J. 260, 789-793]. There is considerable structural homology within each gene family, with the result that whereas reverse-phase h.p.l.c. successfully differentiates individual subunits, immunocytochemical and Northern-blotting analyses may only differentiate families. Enzymic activity, h.p.l.c. and Northern blotting indicated that expression of GST increased from very low levels at 12 days of foetal growth to substantial amounts at day 21. At birth, GST concentrations underwent a dramatic decline and remained low until 5-10 days post partum, after which they increased to adult levels. During the period under study, GST subunits underwent differential expression. The Mu family had a lower level of expression than the Alpha family, and, within the Alpha family, subunit 1 was more dominant in the adult than the foetus. Subunit 2 is the major form in the foetus. Most noteworthy were subunits 7 and 10, which were prominent in the foetus, but present at low levels post partum. Immunocytochemical analysis of the 17-day foetal and newborn rat livers showed marked differences in the distribution of GSTs in hepatocytes. In the 17-day foetal liver Pi greater than Alpha greater than Mu whereas in the newborns Alpha greater than Mu much greater than Pi. Erythropoietic cells were not stained for any of the three GST families. Steady-state mRNA concentrations in the foetus correlated with the relative transcription of the Alpha, Mu and Pi class genes. However, in those genes expressed post partum, namely the Alpha and Mu class, low transcriptional activity was associated with high concentrations of mRNA. This suggests that there is a switch from transcriptional control to post-transcriptional control at birth. GST 7-7 appears to be regulated predominantly by transcription throughout the period of liver development under observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.