Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15388461›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2004

Rifalazil treats and prevents relapse of clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hamsters.

Pauline M Anton, Michael O'Brien, Efi Kokkotou, Barry Eisenstein, Arthur Michaelis, David Rothstein, Sophia Paraschos, Ciáran P Kelly, Charalabos Pothoulakis

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Mouse Model of MildMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Establishment of an EndogenousFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Clinical update for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2014
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pauline M AntonBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Dana 601, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215, USA. cpothoul@bidmc.harvard.edu
Michael O'Brien
Efi Kokkotou
Barry Eisenstein
Arthur Michaelis
David Rothstein
Sophia Paraschos
Ciáran P Kelly
Charalabos Pothoulakis
ActivBiotics (United States) · USBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although vancomycin and metronidazole effectively treat Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis (CDAD), their use is associated with a high incidence of relapsing C. difficile infection. Rifalazil is a new benzoxazinorifamycin that possesses activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and gram-positive bacteria. Here we compared rifalazil and vancomycin for effectiveness in preventing or treating clindamycin-induced cecitis in a hamster model of CDAD. Golden Syrian hamsters were injected subcutaneously with clindamycin phosphate (10 mg/kg), followed 24 h later by C. difficile gavage. Hamsters received by gavage for 5 days vehicle, vancomycin (50 mg/kg), or rifalazil (20 mg/kg) either simultaneously with (prophylactic protocol) or 24 h after C. difficile administration (treatment protocol). While all vehicle-administered animals became moribund within 48 h of C. difficile administration, no rifalazil- or vancomycin-treated animals in either protocol showed signs of morbidity after 7 days. Ceca of rifalazil-treated animals showed absence of epithelial cell damage, significantly reduced congestion and edema, and less, but not statistically significantly less, neutrophil infiltration compared to those of vehicle-treated animals. In contrast, vancomycin-treated animals demonstrated severe epithelial cell damage and mildly reduced congestion and edema. Moreover, hamsters relapsed and tested C. difficile toxin positive (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) 10 to 15 days after discontinuation of vancomycin treatment. None of the rifalazil-treated hamsters showed signs of disease or presence of toxins in their feces 30 days after discontinuation of treatment. Our results indicate that once daily rifalazil may be superior to vancomycin for curative treatment of CDAD.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCecumClostridioides difficileCricetinaeDiarrheaEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayMesocricetusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRifamycinsSecondary PreventionSurvival AnalysisVancomycinWeight LossAnti-Bacterial AgentsKRM 1648RifamycinsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID15388461
PMCPMC521872
OpenAlexW2137573720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.