Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15388418›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2004

Pharmacodynamic functions: a multiparameter approach to the design of antibiotic treatment regimens.

Roland R Regoes, Camilla Wiuff, Renata M Zappala, Kim N Garner, Fernando Baquero, Bruce R Levin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 179 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
179citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

179 citing papers in PubMed, 365 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cooperative antibiotic response in coupled biofilm and planktonicbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Epistasis-mediated compensatory evolution in a fitness landscape with adaptational tradeoffs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roland R RegoesDepartment of Biology, Emory University, 1510 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. rregoes@emory.edu
Camilla Wiuff
Renata M Zappala
Kim N Garner
Fernando Baquero
Bruce R Levin
Emory University · USHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ES

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008169 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, ROBERT E · 1987 to 2021
$20.3M
Theoretical and experimental strudy of the population and evolutionary dynamics oR01GM091875 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEVIN, BRUCE RICHARD · 2009 to 2017
$2.5M
Quantititive models of CD8+ immune memoryR01AI049334 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ANTIA, RUSTOM NOSHIR · 2001 to 2011
$1.6M
POPULATION BIOLOGY OF BACTERIAL VIRUSES AND PLASMIDSR01GM033782 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI LEVIN, BRUCE RICHARD · 1985 to 2002
$744k
NIAID NIH HHS AI 49334NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049334NIGMS NIH HHS GM33782NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM033782NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM091875NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a complex quantitative relationship between the concentrations of antibiotics and the growth and death rates of bacteria. Despite this complexity, in most cases only a single pharmacodynamic parameter, the MIC of the drug, is employed for the rational development of antibiotic treatment regimens. In this report, we use a mathematical model based on a Hill function-which we call the pharmacodynamic function and which is related to previously published E(max) models-to describe the relationship between the bacterial net growth rates and the concentrations of antibiotics of five different classes: ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, streptomycin, and rifampin. Using Escherichia coli O18:K1:H7, we illustrate how precise estimates of the four parameters of the pharmacodynamic function can be obtained from in vitro time-kill data. We show that, in addition to their respective MICs, these antibiotics differ in the values of the other pharmacodynamic parameters. Using a computer simulation of antibiotic treatment in vivo, we demonstrate that, as a consequence of differences in pharmacodynamic parameters, such as the steepness of the Hill function and the minimum bacterial net growth rate attained at high antibiotic concentrations, there can be profound differences in the microbiological efficacy of antibiotics with identical MICs. We discuss the clinical implications and limitations of these results.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveComputer SimulationEscherichia coliKineticsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID15388418
PMCPMC521919
OpenAlexW2095833414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.