Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15387362›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2004

Studies on the time course of the effects of the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii on electrolyte transport in pig jejunum.

B Schroeder, C Winckler, K Failing, G Breves

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Article
  3. Diversity ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

B SchroederDepartment of Physiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany. bernd.shroeder@tiho-hannover.de
C Winckler
K Failing
G Breves
BOKU University · ATHannover Re (Germany) · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orally administered Saccharomyces boulardii (synonym Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hansen CBS 5926) has already been shown to affect relevant functions of the mucosa in pig jejunum such as lowering the secretory response to theophylline or stimulating sodium/glucose cotransport, but knowledge of time-dependent relationship is minimal. In this study we examined the effects of S. boulardii on sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl-) transport in pig jejunum under nonstimulated (basal) and stimulated (secretory) conditions. For this purpose the conventional Ussing chamber method was used for measuring electrical parameters (short circuit currents, Isc; tissue conductances, G(T)) and electrolyte transport of isolated intact jejunal epithelia in the absence and presence of the secretagogue theophylline (10 mM, serosal side). Time profiles of the mucosa response were assessed by treating animals perorally with S. boulardii for 0 (control), 3, 8, and 16 days. Intestinal tissues were obtained from growing pigs in the weight range between 25 and 40 kg. All animals were fed twice daily and received 1.0-1.6 kg/day of a standard diet avoiding probiotics as food additives. After a 9- to 10-day adaptation period the diets for treated animals were supplemented with approximately 1.8 x 10(7) colony forming units (CFU)/g feed of the probiotic. Whereas basal tissue conductances were not affected by treatment duration, basal Isc values decreased significantly during 8 days of treatment, by 26%, indicating a lower electrogenic net ion transport, which, however, was reconstituted after 16 days. This effect could be explained by almost the same reduction of basal Jms of Na+ during 8 days of treatment, whereas respective flux rates in the opposite direction remained stable. Under basal conditions unidirectional and net flux rates of Cl- were not affected by S. boulardii. Induction of secretory conditions by theophylline revealed pronounced increases in net Cl- secretion but this effect was more than 60% lower after 8-day S. boulardii application, and this was reflected by a respectively lower Isc stimulation. Interestingly, this inhibitory effect on the secretory response could no longer be observed in the 16-day group. And this was reflected by a respectively lower Isc stimulation. A similar effect could be observed regarding net Na+ flux rates. Residual fluxes were affected neither by S. boulardii nor by theophylline, therefore, Isc values can be explained completely by respective Na+ and Cl- fluxes. In conclusion, S. boulardii has specific duration-dependent effects on the secretory response of the pig jejunal mucosa which developed during 8-day treatment but disappeared during further application. Thus, this study supports the concept that probiotics may exert beneficial effects in the gastrointestinal tract.

Indexed as

SaccharomycesAnimalsBiological TransportChloridesHybridization, GeneticIntestinal MucosaJejunumModels, AnimalProbioticsSodiumSwineTheophyllineTime FactorsChloridesSodiumTheophylline

Identifiers

PMID15387362
OpenAlexW2013667334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.