ArticleMolecular diversity2004
The use of peptide arrays for the characterization of monospecific antibody repertoires from polyclonal sera of psychiatric patients suspected of infection by Borna Disease Virus.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2017Article
- Bacterial urease and its role in long-lasting human diseases.Current protein & peptide science · 2012Review
- TNF-overexpression in Borna disease virus-infected mouse brains triggers inflammatory reaction and epileptic seizures.PloS one · 2012Article
- Competition between bound and free peptides in an ELISA-based procedure that assays peptides derived from protein digests.Proteome science · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Borna Disease Virus (BDV) is suspected to infect humans and to be associated with psychiatric disorders. To this date, BDV-reactive antibodies provide the only reliable markers to diagnose human BDV infection. Their diagnostic value, however, was recently questioned by the observation that these antibodies recognize BDV antigen with only low avidity, a typical feature of cross-reacting antibodies. This raised the possibility that the human BDV-reactive antibodies were triggered by other pathogens than BDV. The recent establishment of a peptide array-based screening test allowed the further characterization of these antibodies. It revealed the presence of small amounts of BDV-reactive antibodies in crude human sera that specifically recognized various epitopes of three major BDV proteins. Most importantly, the purified epitope-specific antibodies were shown to bind to BDV antigen with high avidity when assayed by conventional immunofluorescence assay (IFA) or by Western blot. These results are compatible with the view that the presence of BDV-reactive antibodies in human sera reflects an infection with BDV, although the poor affinity maturation remains unexplained. Furthermore, it demonstrates that peptide array-based screening tests are a reliable system for identifying monospecific antibodies from human polyclonal sera with high specificity and sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.