ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2004
Comparative analysis of the ribosomal components of the hydrogenosome-containing protist, Trichomonas vaginalis.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cryo-EM structures of the 80S ribosomes from human parasites Trichomonas vaginalis and Toxoplasma gondii.Cell research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The ribosomes of the amitochondriate but hydrogenosome-containing protist lineage, the trichomonads, have previously been reported to be prokaryotic or primitive eukaryotic, based on evidence that they have a 70S sedimentation coefficient and a small number of proteins, similar to prokaryotic ribosomes. In order to determine whether the components of the trichomonad ribosome indeed differ from those of typical eukaryotic ribosomes, the ribosome of a representative trichomonad, Trichomonas vaginalis, was characterized. The sedimentation coefficient of the T. vaginalis ribosome was smaller than that of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and larger than that of Escherichia coli. Based on two-dimensional PAGE analysis, the number of different ribosomal proteins was estimated to be approximately 80. This number is the same as those obtained for typical eukaryotes (approximately 80) but larger than that of E. coli (approximately 55). N-Terminal amino acid sequencing of 18 protein spots and the complete sequences of 4 ribosomal proteins as deduced from their genes revealed these sequences to display typical eukaryotic features. Phylogenetic analyses of the five ribosomal proteins currently available also clearly confirmed that the T. vaginalis sequences are positioned within a eukaryotic clade. Comparison of deduced secondary structure models of the small and large subunit rRNAs of T. vaginalis with those of other eukaryotes revealed that all helices commonly found in typical eukaryotes are present and conserved in T. vaginalis, while variable regions are shortened or lost. These lines of evidence demonstrate that the T. vaginalis ribosome has no prokaryotic or primitive eukaryotic features but is clearly a typical eukaryotic type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.