Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15383452›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

Combined use of rapid D-dimer testing and estimation of clinical probability in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: systematic review.

Tonya L Fancher, Richard H White, Richard L Kravitz

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Role of D-dimer in the Development of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis: A Meta-analysis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Phlebothrombosis of the leg. Diagnostic algorithm and therapeutic implications].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tonya L FancherDivision of General Medicine, University of California at Davis, Patient Support Services Building, Suite 2400, Sacramento, California 95817, USA. Tonya.Fancher@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
Richard H White
Richard L Kravitz
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

PHS HHS 1 D55 HP 00232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarise the evidence supporting the use of rapid d-dimer testing combined with estimation of clinical probability to exclude the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis among outpatients. DATA SOURCES: Medline (June 1993 to December 2003), the Database of Abstracts and Reviews (DARE), and reference lists of studies in English. SELECTION OF STUDIES: We selected 12 studies from among 84 reviewed. The selected studies included more than 5000 patients and used a rapid D-dimer assay and explicit criteria to classify cases as having low, intermediate, or high clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity among consecutive outpatients. REVIEW

methodsDiagnosis required objective confirmation, and untreated patients had to have at least three months of follow up. The outcome was objectively documented venous thromboembolism. Two authors independently abstracted data by using a data collection form.

resultsWhen the less sensitive SimpliRED D-dimer assay was used the three month incidence of venous thromboembolism was 0.5% (95% confidence interval 0.07% to 1.1%) among patients with a low clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis and normal D-dimer concentrations. When a highly sensitive D-dimer assay was used, the three month incidence of venous thromboembolism was 0.4% (0.04% to 1.1%) among outpatients with low or moderate clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis and a normal D-dimer concentration.

conclusionsThe combination of low clinical probability for deep vein thrombosis and a normal result from the SimpliRED D-dimer test safely excludes a diagnosis of acute venous thrombosis A normal result from a highly sensitive D-dimer test effectively rules out deep vein thrombosis among patients classified as having either low or moderate clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis.

Indexed as

BiomarkersEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansSensitivity and SpecificityVenous ThrombosisBiomarkersFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment D

Identifiers

PMID15383452
PMCPMC521568
OpenAlexW2139088247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.